Complete Section Four: Outcomes and Evaluation of your Action Research Proposal.

Expected outcomes

For each action goal you presented in Section Three, provide specific outcomes you hope to see if you were to implement this action research project.
Each goal may have several outcomes; therefore, number each outcome and present it in list form.
The outcomes should be stated in observable, measurable terms (example: The researcher anticipates that the intervention will result in 50% of the participants having increased reading scores).
The outcomes should relate specifically to the documentation you provide.
Measurement of outcomes (Discuss data collection methods such as observations, interviews, grades, test scores, etc.).

Describe how you plan to measure each projected outcome.
Be specific about particular instruments and methods you would use.
This information is intended to aid another researcher interested in replicating your study.
Where possible, include copies of tests, questionnaires, or other instruments in an Appendix.
Analysis of results

Describe how you plan to analyze your results. Will you use bar graphs, pie charts, etc?
Will you use coding to look for patterns or themes that may emerge? Will you conduct an interim data analysis?
Explain how you would determine if your solution strategy was effective.
Explain how you would present your report of findings and to whom you would present them.
References

List all sources you used to complete and support your action research proposal, particularly those used for the literature review.
You should have at minimum the 7 sources from your literature review that were listed on the ARP Section Two reference page.
Ensure your sources are cited according to APA guidelines throughout the paper. Be sure to format the reference page, per APA format.

Reminders: Use APA format. Always include a title page, an introduction and a conclusion.

I have the instructions, title, and 5 references I will send it to the writer of my choice. I prefer a psychology major to bid on the paper. I don’t care how good you write I care about you showing you understand what you’re writing about and can follow APA 6th addition guidelines.

Chapter 4
CHECKS is a heuristic that is being used to facilitate evidence-based assessment (EBA). The
model of CHECKS in Chapter 4 follows the assessment and treatment planning of an adolescent
named Melinda. Please use each letter of the acronym CHECKS and following the model in the
chapter, describe a case you might see of a child or adolescent that has come to you as a result of
trauma. Please do not feel compelled to have sexual abuse or assault as the focus of the trauma.
As you see in the example, Melinda had additional traumas related to loss, which you should
consider including in your model.
Breaking down the CHECKS heuristic by letter, please develop the assessment and treatment
plan for the person (real or imagined) that you choose. I understand you have not assessed the
person as was done in the model; however, please include assessment instruments that you might
use to assess the particular issues that individual has come to you for. Be sure to clearly identify
what letter of the CHECKS heuristic you are writing about, and separate paragraphs. With
respect to treatment issues, please describe what treatment interventions would be appropriate for
your model. In addition, please remember to talk about post-intervention; how would you do it?
How long would you follow-up with the individual?

Chapter 5
Choose a theory about PTSD from Chapter 5 and find at least 2 peer-reviewed sources that
further expand on the theory you chose. Consider the following questions:
Why did you choose this theory?
Why do you feel this theory is the best way to understand PTSD?
How do the additional sources help you better understand the theory?