Archive for October 4th, 2020

Assistive Technology

What are examples of the use of technology in classrooms today as a result of the COVID-19
Pandemic?
a. (Minimum of 3 examples REQUIRED)
3. Give examples of how the use of Powerpoint Presentations in a classroom lesson, can enhance the experience for students with different learning needs, both in class and virtually.
(Differentiated Instruction).
4.How technology impacts teachers in the classroom.
5. Conclusion / References

I added a paper I had if it helps lol if not no biggie

Disc 2

Suppose you are interested in the behaviors of physicians that have high ratings of patient satisfaction. The research goal is to identify the behaviors in the natural clinical settings of these successful physicians so that these behaviors can be built into the curricula of medical preparation programs. The main data were collected by the video recording of five randomly selected physician-patient encounters from 10 physicians who have been rated highly by patients in a reliable satisfaction survey.

Assume that you reviewed the literature on physician communication skills as a major component of patient satisfaction. Based on this idea, what might be some of the initial codes that you could use to label the data units? How would you justify this set of codes in your research report?

Disc 1

Suppose you are interested in the behaviors of physicians that have high ratings of patient satisfaction. The research goal is to identify the behaviors in the natural clinical settings of these successful physicians so that these behaviors can be built into the curricula of medical preparation programs. The main data were collected by the video recording of five randomly selected physician-patient encounters from 10 physicians who have been rated highly by patients in a reliable satisfaction survey.

In analyzing the recordings, what would you define as the unit for analysis? Why? How many data units (in rough estimates) are you likely to get based on this decision? Does the estimated number of data units seem adequate? Why or why not?

Water Quallity: Populations most at risk and current events

I have attached the instructions for the assignment. This is part of a group presentation, and my part will be “Identify populations most at risk for negative health outcomes related to exposure. (e.g., ages, pre-existing health conditions, income levels, gender, ethnicity, race)?” and “Present information on current events related to your topic”. 

There are links in the attached document to use as references, but you are not limited to them.

Thank you in advance.

Analysis of module one

To complete this assignment, you will need to have reviewed and studies all the material in Module One.

Assignment Instructions

Write an analysis of the skills and requirements for a career in healthcare information technology, including a self-reflection of the skill development you will need in order to enter a career in healthcare information technology.  Your analysis should be 3 to 5 pages, double-spaced with standard-size font, and should include the following points:

Trends in health information technology.
Current and developing skill requirements in HIT.
Skills possessed by current top performers in HIT.
Self-reflection; what needed skills do you now possess and what skills must you develop.

May need to log into my student account and review module one
My KSU username is – ahowar88@students.kennesaw.edu
Password – Dekhario_parker98

Low level education in Russia

use both theoretical and practical dimensions to provide a detailed analysis by answering the following questions:
What is the challenge? 
What is driving or causing it? 
What are the environmental factors prevalent? 
Who are the people most impacted (general characteristics and main pains)? How do they behave?
Are there any unique circumstances that need to be identified?
How might we solve this challenge (initial thoughts and ideas on how this problem can be addressed)

Note
Students must define and offer a context of the initial challenge prior before trying to reframe it.
Any identified causes of the challenge MUST be qualified with data and statistics 
The intervention SHOULD be proactive in nature 
You are NOT expected to provide a persona and an empathy map for the selected target group

Discussion

Your task is to explore how the structure of the integumentary and skeletal systems contribute to their role as the body’s first line of defense.

Instructions

1. Choose one specific location on the body (e.g., hand, thigh, abdomen, etc.) and respond to the following in a post of at least 300 words:

2. Describe the structure of each layer of skin at your chosen location and how it is related to its specific function at that location.

3. Describe how the structure of skin appendages present at your chosen location is adapted for its given function.

4. What joints are present in your chosen location?

5. Describe the structure of the joint(s) and associated bones and other structures. What function does this joint perform?

Preparing the Assignment For this assignment, choose from the theories/models presented in the weekly lesson. Health Belief Model Transtheoretical Model of Behavioral Change Social Cognitive Theory Family Systems Theory Family Assessment and Intervention

Preparing the Assignment
For this assignment, choose from the theories/models presented in the weekly lesson.
Health Belief Model
Transtheoretical Model of Behavioral Change
Social Cognitive Theory
Family Systems Theory
Family Assessment and Intervention Model
Praxis Theory of Suffering
Search the library for literature. Locate 5 (five) articles related to the selected theories. You may use no more than two articles related to each theory/model.
Sources should be related to nursing practice using the selected theory/model.
Sources should be scholarly, relevant to the theory/model and to nursing, and published within the past 5 years. If source is older than 5 years, instructor permission should be obtained and the historical significance of the article should be explained.
Prepare an annotated entry for each source. Begin with the full APA citation of the source, followed by 2-3 paragraphs:
Summarize the article.
Describe how the article relates to the chosen theory/model.
Reflect on how the article could (or could not) be relevant to future Nurse Practitioner practice.
Criteria for Format and Special Instructions
The paper should include a separate title page using APA format. No reference page is necessary as the references will be incorporated into the body of the bibliography.
Entries should be alphabetized by author.
A minimum of 5 (five) scholarly references must be used. Required textbooks for this course, and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment. Be aware that information from .com websites may be incorrect and should be avoided.
References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them.
In-text citations are not required in the annotated bibliography.
Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing.
ASSIGNMENT CONTENT

Category

Points

%

Description

Quantity of Sources

15

7.5

The annotated bibliography contains at least 5 sources.

Quality of Sources

20

10

Articles reviewed are from scholarly sources

Recency of Sources                                                                           

15

7.5

All sources are published within 5 years; if older, permission to use obtained and historical significance explained

Summary of Annotations

40

20

Annotations comprehensively describe source material, clearly conveying main ideas.

Relation to Theory/Model

40

20

Annotations contain a clear description on how the source relates to the theory/model

Reflection

40

20

Annotations contain a clear reflection of the relevance of the source material to future practice.

Total CONTENT Points= [170 pts]

ASSIGNMENT FORMAT

Category

Points

%

Description

Assignment Specifications

10

5

Annotated bibliography format utilized. Entries are alphabetized by author. Title page included.

APA Format (current edition)

10

5

Title page and references must follow APA guidelines as found in the current edition of the manual. One deduction for each type of APA style error

Writing Mechanics

10

5

Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA manual.

Total FORMAT Points= [30 pts]

ASSIGNMENT TOTAL= 200 points

Rubric
NR501NP_Annot_Bib_MARCH20
NR501NP_Annot_Bib_MARCH20
Criteria    Ratings    Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Quantity of Sources
15.0 pts
Excellent
5 sources utilized
14.0 pts
V. Good
4 sources utilized
12.0 pts
Satisfactory
3 sources utilized
8.0 pts
Needs Improvement
2 sources utilized
0.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
1 or fewer sources utilized
15.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Quality of Sources
20.0 pts
Excellent
All selected works are from scholarly sources.
18.0 pts
V. Good
1 selected work is from a non-scholarly source.
17.0 pts
Satisfactory
2 selected works are from non-scholarly sources.
10.0 pts
Needs Improvement
3 selected works are from non-scholarly sources.
0.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
4 or more selected works are from non-scholarly sources.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Recency of Sources
15.0 pts
Excellent
All sources are less than 5 years old; if older, permission obtained and historical significance explained.
14.0 pts
V. Good
1 source older than 5 years old without permission obtained or no explanation of historical significance.
12.0 pts
Satisfactory
2 sources older than 5 years old without permission obtained or no explanation of historical significance.
8.0 pts
Needs Improvement
3 sources older than 5 years old without permission obtained or no explanation of historical significance.
0.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
4 or more sources older than 5 years old without permission obtained or no explanation of historical significance.
15.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Summary of Annotations
40.0 pts
Excellent
All annotations complete with clear explanation (or description) of source material.
36.0 pts
V. Good
1 annotation lacked clarity or completeness.
33.0 pts
Satisfactory
2 annotations lacked clarity or completeness.
20.0 pts
Needs Improvement
3 annotations lacked clarity or completeness.
0.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
4 or more annotations lacked clarity or completeness.
40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Relation to Theory/Model
40.0 pts
Excellent
All annotations contain a clear description on how the source relates to the theory/model.
36.0 pts
V. Good
1 annotation lacked a clear description on how the source relates to the theory/model.
33.0 pts
Satisfactory
2 annotations lacked a clear description on how the source relates to the theory/model.
20.0 pts
Needs Improvement
3 annotations lacked a clear description on how the source relates to the theory/model.
0.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
4 or more annotations lacked a clear description on how the source relates to the theory/model.
40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Reflection
40.0 pts
Excellent
All annotations contain a clear reflection of the relevance of the source material to future nursing practice. First person may be utilized.
36.0 pts
V. Good
1 annotation lacked a clear reflection of the relevance of the source material to future nursing practice. First person may be utilized.
33.0 pts
Satisfactory
2 annotations lacked a clear reflection of the relevance of the source material to future nursing practice. First person may be utilized.
20.0 pts
Needs Improvement
3 annotations lacked a clear reflection of the relevance of the source material to future nursing practice. First person may be utilized.
0.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
4 or more annotations lacked a clear reflection of the relevance of the source material to future nursing practice. First person may be utilized.
40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Paper Specifications
Critical elements:
    Annotated bibliography format utilized.
    Entries are alphabetized by author.
    Title page and running head included.
    Each theory is used for no more than 2 annotations
10.0 pts
Excellent
This section included all critical elements.
9.0 pts
V. Good
This section included three of the critical elements.
8.0 pts
Satisfactory
This section included only two of the critical elements.
5.0 pts
Needs Improvement
This section included only one of the critical elements.
0.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
This section included none of the critical elements.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA Style
APA guidelines, as per the current edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the
    title page,
    running head,
    references
One deduction for each type of APA format error
10.0 pts
Excellent
0 to 1 APA error was present.
9.0 pts
V. Good
2-3 APA errors were present.
8.0 pts
Satisfactory
4-5 APA were present.
5.0 pts
Needs Improvement
6-7 APA were present.
0.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
8 or greater APA errors were present.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing Quality
Submission follows the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA manual.
10.0 pts
Excellent
12 errors or exceptions were present.
9.0 pts
V. Good
3-4 errors or exceptions were present.
8.0 pts
Satisfactory
5-6 errors or exceptions were present.
5.0 pts
Needs Improvement
7-8 errors or exceptions were present.
0.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
9 or greater errors or exceptions were present.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Late penalty deductions
Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment.
0.0 pts
Manual Deductions
0.0 pts
Manual Deductions
0.0 pts
Total Points: 200.0
Previous Next

open Bible final.

Final Paper
So what is the point of all this study of the New Testament? Is it just ancient history with no relevance for today? Is it just a wearisome study? Even a verse in the Old Testament reads, “Be warned, my son, of anything in addition to them. Of making many books there is no end, and much study wearies the body” (Ecclesiastes 12:12, NIV).

One of the key points in studying the New Testament is to understand the examples set for us in these ancient pages. In 1 Corinthians 10:6 and 10:11-12 (NIV), Paul wrote these words of warning in regard to all the stories of faith in the Old Testament. Certainly they also apply to what we now have compiled in the New Testament:

Now these things occurred as examples to keep us from setting our hearts on evil things as they did These things happened to them as examples and were written down as warnings for us, on whom the culmination of the ages has come. So, if you think you are standing firm, be careful that you dont fall!

The New Testament is a lesson in life. Learn from their mistakes. Model their successes. Listen to their instruction. Follow the Jesus who called both them and you.

The final is a 3-5 page, researched response paper to three of the four following essay questions. In the paper, you will need to integrate information gained from all previous assignments. Utilize and reference at least six biblical references, properly citing Scripture in APA format. Use at least four academic references to support your response (you may use your textbook as one of your resources and the Bible as another). Please use the library website to assist you in finding more academic resources.

This is an open note, open textbook, and open Bible final.

The following are the four essay questions. Please select three to respond to:

Drawing on the entire New Testament, make a list of five names and titles used to identify Jesus. Discuss the meaning of each name or title, the person(s) using it, and the place in the New Testament where you found the usage. Discuss how the title helped to explain some aspect of Jesus character or role and why that would be attractive to the audience of the writer. After you finish doing this, choose two names or titles that you find to be most helpful or impactful to you. Explain why you chose these names or titles and what significance they have to you personally.
Having studied and read about the expansion of the early Christian church and movement, discuss the factors (personal, religious, political, etc.) which contributed to its spread. What are the most important factors that you have discovered throughout this study? Do not just list, but explain why you chose the people, events, or cultural issues that helped Christianity spread through the Roman world.
Explain why the Johannine literature is important to a student of the New Testament.
Discuss the New Testament assertion of Jesus as God the Son. What are the implications? How did Jesus and His followers communicate this unique relationship between God the Father and God the Son? Explore, specifically, both the incarnation and the attributes of God in Christ. Draw specific textual support from John 1, Philippians 2, Colossians 1, and other New Testament reading, and from all previous assignments.

Any topic (writer’s choice)

ASSIGNMENT
*NOTE: No definitions are needed for concepts.

ALL THE FOLLOWING MUST BE ADDRESSED IN YOUR PRESENTATION
Q1) Give a brief overview of the entire case (also include current information).
Q2) Based on chapter 2: Create a new mission statement include all nine (9)-mission statement components  (You must identify the number & components but you do not have to explain the components).
Q3) Based on chapter 3: Based on an external audit discuss one (1) O:opportunity & (1) T: threat.
Q4) Based on chapter 4: Based on an internal audit discuss one (1) S: strength & (1) W: weakness.
Q5) Recommendations: Discuss one recommendation for each (SWOT)