Archive for March 26th, 2022

RubricDetai1WEEK4nrnp6665.docx

Rubric Detail

 

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Name: NRNP_6665_Week4_Assignment_Rubric

·

·

 

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Create documentation in the Focused SOAP Note Template about the patient in the case study.In the Subjective section, provide:• Chief complaint• History of present illness (HPI)• Past psychiatric history• Medication trials and current medications• Psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis• Pertinent substance use, family psychiatric/substance use, social, and medical history• Allergies• ROS

14 (14%) - 15 (15%)

The response throughly and accurately describes the patient's subjective complaint, history of present illness, past psychiatric history, medication trials and current medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, pertinent histories, allergies, and review of all systems that would inform a differential diagnosis.

12 (12%) - 13 (13%)

The response accurately describes the patient's subjective complaint, history of present illness, past psychiatric history, medication trials and current medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, pertinent histories, allergies, and review of all systems that would inform a differential diagnosis.

11 (11%) - 11 (11%)

The response describes the patient's subjective complaint, history of present illness, past psychiatric history, medication trials and current medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, pertinent histories, allergies, and review of all systems that would inform a differential diagnosis but is somewhat vague or contains minor innacuracies.

0 (0%) - 10 (10%)

The response provides an incomplete or inaccurate description of the patient's subjective complaint, history of present illness, past psychiatric history, medication trials and current medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, pertinent histories, allergies, and review of all systems that would inform a differential diagnosis. Or the subjective documentation is missing.

In the Objective section, provide:• Review of Systems (ROS) documentation and relate if pertinent to the chief complaint, HPI, and history• Diagnostic results, including any labs, imaging, or other assessments needed to develop the differential diagnoses

14 (14%) - 15 (15%)

The response thoroughly and accurately documents the patient's ROS for pertinent systems. Diagnostic tests and their results are thoroughly and accurately documented.

12 (12%) - 13 (13%)

The response accurately documents the patient's ROS for pertinent systems. Diagnostic tests and their results are accurately documented.

11 (11%) - 11 (11%)

Documentation of the patient's ROS is somewhat vague or contains minor innacuracies. Diagnostic tests and their results are documented but contain minor inaccuracies.

0 (0%) - 10 (10%)

The response provides incomplete or inaccurate documentation of the patient's ROS. Systems may have been unnecessarily reviewed. Or the objective documentation is missing.

In the Assessment section, provide:• Results of the mental status examination, presented in paragraph form• At least three differentials with supporting evidence. List them from top priority to least priority. Compare the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for each differential diagnosis and explain what DSM-5 criteria rules out the differential diagnosis to find an accurate diagnosis. Explain the critical-thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case.

18 (18%) - 20 (20%)

The response thoroughly and accurately documents the results of the mental status exam.Response lists at least three distinctly different and detailed possible disorders in order of priority for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, and it provides a thorough, accurate, and detailed justification for each of the disorders selected.

16 (16%) - 17 (17%)

The response accurately documents the results of the mental status exam.Response lists at least three distinctly different and detailed possible disorders in order of priority for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, and it provides an accurate justification for each of the disorders selected.

14 (14%) - 15 (15%)

The response documents the results of the mental status exam with some vagueness or innacuracy.Response lists at least three different possible disorders for a differential diagnosis of the patient and provides a justification for each, but may contain some vagueness or innacuracy.

0 (0%) - 13 (13%)

The response provides an incomplete or inaccurate description of the results of the mental status exam and explanation of the differential diagnoses. Or the assessment documentation is missing.

In the Plan section, provide:• Your plan for psychotherapy• Your plan for treatment and management, including alternative therapies. Include pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters as well as a rationale for this treatment and management plan.• Incorporate one health promotion activity and one patient education strategy.

23 (23%) - 25 (25%)

The response provides an evidence-based, detailed, and appropriate plan for psychotherapy for the patient.The response provides an evidence-based, detailed, and appropriate plan for treatment and management, including pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters. A strong rationale for the plan is provided that demonstrates critical thinking and content understanding.The response includes at least one evidence-based health promotion activity and one evidence-based patient education strategy.

20 (20%) - 22 (22%)

The response provides an evidence-based and appropriate plan for psychotherapy for the patient.The response provides an evidence-based and appropriate plan for treatment and management, including pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters. An adequate rationale for the plan is provided.The response includes at least one health promotion activity and one patient education strategy.

18 (18%) - 19 (19%)

The response provides a somewhat vague or inaccurate plan for psychotherapy for the patient.The response provides a somewhat vague or inaccurate plan for treatment and management, including pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters. The rationale for the plan is weak or general.The response includes one health promotion activity and one patient education strategy, but it may contain some vagueness or innacuracy.

0 (0%) - 17 (17%)

The response provides an incomplete or inaccurate plan for psychotherapy for the patient.The response provides an incomplete or inaccurate plan for treatment and management, including pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters. The rationale for the plan is inaccurate or missing.The health promotion and patient education strategies are incomplete or missing.

• Reflect on this case. Discuss what you learned and what you might do differently. Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!), health promotion, and disease prevention that takes into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.).

5 (5%) - 5 (5%)

Reflections are thorough, thoughtful, and demonstrate critical thinking.

4 (4%) - 4 (4%)

Reflections demonstrate critical thinking.

3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)

Reflections are somewhat general or do not demonstrate critical thinking.

0 (0%) - 3 (3%)

Reflections are incomplete, inaccurate, or missing.

Provide at least three evidence-based, peer-reviewed journal articles or evidenced-based guidelines that relate to this case to support your diagnostics and differential diagnoses. Be sure they are current (no more than 5 years old).

9 (9%) - 10 (10%)

The response provides at least three current, evidence-based resources from the literature to support the assessment and diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study. The resources reflect the latest clinical guidelines and provide strong justification for decision making.

8 (8%) - 8 (8%)

The response provides at least three current, evidence-based resources from the literature that appropriately support the assessment and diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study.

7 (7%) - 7 (7%)

Three evidence-based resources are provided to support the assessment and diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, but they may only provide vague or weak justification.

0 (0%) - 6 (6%)

Two or fewer resources are provided to support the assessment and diagnosis decisions. The resources may not be current or evidence based.

Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for parenthetical/in-text citations and reference list.

5 (5%) - 5 (5%)

Uses correct APA format with no errors

4 (4%) - 4 (4%)

Contains a few (one or two) APA format errors

3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (three or four) APA format errors

0 (0%) - 3 (3%)

Contains many (five or more) APA format errors

Written Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and punctuation

5 (5%) - 5 (5%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors

4 (4%) - 4 (4%)

Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

0 (0%) - 3 (3%)

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding

Total Points: 100

Name: NRNP_6665_Week4_Assignment_Rubric

Exit

Exit

MovieReflectionrequire.docx

 Movie Reflection #2 Noah ( Director: Darren Aronofsky) After watching the movie Noah, please write an essay with minimum 900 words in APA format that: 1. Identifies at least 3 differences between the movie plots and Noah's story in the Bible;  2. Illustrates your own understanding of the movie from the perspective of Christianity. Please do NOT summarize the entire plot of the movie *References should follow the APA 6th or APA 7th edition

NRNPPRAC6665and6675FocusedSOAPNoteExemplar1week4.docx

NRNP/PRAC 6665 & 6675 Focused SOAP Psychiatric Evaluation Exemplar

INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO USE EXEMPLAR AND TEMPLATE—READ CAREFULLY

If you are struggling with the format or remembering what to include, follow the Focused SOAP Note Evaluation Template AND the Rubric as your guide. It is also helpful to review the rubric in detail in order not to lose points unnecessarily because you missed something required. After reviewing full details of the rubric, you can use it as a guide.

In the Subjective section, provide:

· Chief complaint

· History of present illness (HPI)

· Past psychiatric history

· Medication trials and current medications

· Psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis

· Pertinent substance use, family psychiatric/substance use, social, and medical history

· Allergies

· ROS

Read rating descriptions to see the grading standards!

In the Objective section, provide:

· Physical exam documentation of systems pertinent to the chief complaint, HPI, and history

· Diagnostic results, including any labs, imaging, or other assessments needed to develop the differential diagnoses.

Read rating descriptions to see the grading standards!

In the Assessment section, provide:

· Results of the mental status examination, presented in paragraph form.

· At least three differentials with supporting evidence. List them from top priority to least priority. Compare the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for each differential diagnosis and explain what DSM-5 criteria rules out the differential diagnosis to find an accurate diagnosis. Explain the critical-thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case.

· Read rating descriptions to see the grading standards!

Reflect on this case. Include: Discuss what you learned and what you might do differently. Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!), health promotion and disease prevention taking into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.).

(The FOCUSED SOAP psychiatric evaluation is typically the follow-up visit patient note. You will practice writing this type of note in this course. You will be focusing more on the symptoms from your differential diagnosis from the comprehensive psychiatric evaluation narrowing to your diagnostic impression. You will write up what symptoms are present and what symptoms are not present from illnesses to demonstrate you have indeed assessed for illnesses which could be impacting your patient. For example, anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, bipolar symptoms, psychosis symptoms, substance use, etc.)

EXEMPLAR BEGINS HERE

Subjective:

CC (chief complaint): A brief statement identifying why the patient is here. This statement is verbatim of the patient’s own words about why presenting for assessment. For a patient with dementia or other cognitive deficits, this statement can be obtained from a family member.

HPI: Begin this section with patient’s initials, age, race, gender, purpose of evaluation, current medication and referral reason. For example:

N.M. is a 34-year-old Asian male presents for medication management follow up for anxiety. He was initiated sertraline last appt which he finds was effective for two weeks then symptoms began to return.

Or

P.H., a 16-year-old Hispanic female, presents for follow up to discuss previous psychiatric evaluation for concentration difficulty. She is not currently prescribed psychotropic medications as we deferred until further testing and screening was conducted.

Then, this section continues with the symptom analysis for your note. Thorough documentation in this section is essential for patient care, coding, and billing analysis.

Paint a picture of what is wrong with the patient. First what is bringing the patient to your follow up evaluation? Document symptom onset, duration, frequency, severity, and impact. What has worsened or improved since last appointment? What stressors are they facing? Your description here will guide your differential diagnoses into your diagnostic impression. You are seeking symptoms that may align with many DSM-5 diagnoses, narrowing to what aligns with diagnostic criteria for mental health and substance use disorders.

Substance Use History: This section contains any history or current use of caffeine, nicotine, illicit substance (including marijuana), and alcohol. Include the daily amount of use and last known use. Include type of use such as inhales, snorts, IV, etc. Include any histories of withdrawal complications from tremors, Delirium Tremens, or seizures.

Current Medications: Include dosage, frequency, length of time used, and reason for use. Also include OTC or homeopathic products.

Allergies: Include medication, food, and environmental allergies separately. Provide a description of what the allergy is (e.g., angioedema, anaphylaxis). This will help determine a true reaction vs. intolerance.

Reproductive Hx: Menstrual history (date of LMP), Pregnant (yes or no), Nursing/lactating (yes or no), contraceptive use (method used), types of intercourse: oral, anal, vaginal, other, any sexual concerns

ROS: Cover all body systems that may help you include or rule out a differential diagnosis. Please note: THIS IS DIFFERENT from a physical examination!

You should list each system as follows: General: Head: EENT: etc. You should list these in bullet format and document the systems in order from head to toe.

Example of Complete ROS:

GENERAL: No weight loss, fever, chills, weakness, or fatigue.

HEENT: Eyes: No visual loss, blurred vision, double vision, or yellow sclerae. Ears, Nose, Throat: No hearing loss, sneezing, congestion, runny nose, or sore throat.

SKIN: No rash or itching.

CARDIOVASCULAR: No chest pain, chest pressure, or chest discomfort. No palpitations or edema.

RESPIRATORY: No shortness of breath, cough, or sputum.

GASTROINTESTINAL: No anorexia, nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea. No abdominal pain or blood.

GENITOURINARY: Burning on urination, urgency, hesitancy, odor, odd color

NEUROLOGICAL: No headache, dizziness, syncope, paralysis, ataxia, numbness, or tingling in the extremities. No change in bowel or bladder control.

MUSCULOSKELETAL: No muscle, back pain, joint pain, or stiffness.

HEMATOLOGIC: No anemia, bleeding, or bruising.

LYMPHATICS: No enlarged nodes. No history of splenectomy.

ENDOCRINOLOGIC: No reports of sweating, cold, or heat intolerance. No polyuria or polydipsia.

Objective:

Diagnostic results: Include any labs, X-rays, or other diagnostics that are needed to develop the differential diagnoses (support with evidenced and guidelines).

Assessment:

Mental Status Examination: For the purposes of your courses, this section must be presented in paragraph form and not use of a checklist! This section you will describe the patient’s appearance, attitude, behavior, mood and affect, speech, thought processes, thought content, perceptions (hallucinations, pseudohallucinations, illusions, etc.)., cognition, insight, judgment, and SI/HI. See an example below. You will modify to include the specifics for your patient on the above elements—DO NOT just copy the example. You may use a preceptor’s way of organizing the information if the MSE is in paragraph form.

He is an 8-year-old African American male who looks his stated age. He is cooperative with examiner. He is neatly groomed and clean, dressed appropriately. There is no evidence of any abnormal motor activity. His speech is clear, coherent, normal in volume and tone. His thought process is goal directed and logical. There is no evidence of looseness of association or flight of ideas. His mood is euthymic, and his affect appropriate to his mood. He was smiling at times in an appropriate manner. He denies any auditory or visual hallucinations. There is no evidence of any delusional thinking.   He denies any current suicidal or homicidal ideation. Cognitively, he is alert and oriented. His recent and remote memory is intact. His concentration is good. His insight is good. 

Health care promotion wk3

1. How do you define ethics in the context of health promotion communication?

2.  Explain the difference between ethics and morality 

3. Outline a guide for making ethical decisions 

4. Identify ethical issues associated with the profession of health education/promotion

5. Explain how a profession can ensure that its professional will act ethically.

400-500 words total 

researchpaper.docx

For this research project, you will select a topic related to your major or a career interest and find an issue within that area that is being researched so you can find authoritative sources on the issue. Talk to professors and other students in your major or working professionals in a field you are interested in and find issues that are being researched and studied. Avoid topics based primarily on personal belief, subjective opinion, or questionable sources. If you do not have a major, then choose a topic that is being researched so you will be able to find authoritative evidence. You can refer to the list at the end of this assignment if you would like some ideas for topics.* We will be working on this project for the next seven weeks, and it is important that you select a topic you are interested in and that you stay on schedule with the project.

With this assignment, we will systematically go through the research process. After you select an issue to research, you will do preliminary research to gain an overall understanding of the issue and will develop a research question(s) to guide your efforts as you narrow and focus that issue. You will move to more focused research and will need to find at least eight authoritative sources on the topic, including peer-reviewed journal articles (three), scholarly books, government documents, specialized magazine articles, and/or interviews with experts. You will be writing a researched argument essay, so select a topic that will allow you to make and develop a claim, not just write an informational paper. The following are descriptions of the five assignments you will complete for this project: (1) research log, (2) proposal, (3) annotated bibliography, (4) plan, and (5) researched argument essay.

Research Log (25 points): To help you keep track of your research, you will keep a research log for the six hours of research you conduct during week ten. You can use whatever format you want for the log, but you should include the following information: identify the date, the amount of time spent, the sources you accessed, the information you found, along with any notes, insights, or ideas you may have related to your research. Use a format that works for you and will be a useful way to keep track of the information you find that you can use within your researched argument essay and the bibliographic information you will need for citing sources.

Proposal (25 points). You will write a proposal that identifies your topic for the research project and includes the following:

Describe your topic, providing any necessary background information and explanation so your readers—the professor and other students in the class—will be able to understand your topic.

Identify why you chose the topic, how it relates to your major or another academic discipline, how you have narrowed and focused it, and what your research question(s) is.

Include a list of four sources you have found on your research topic and put them into the documentation style you select (MLA or APA); remember to alphabetize the sources.

Annotated Bibliography (150 points). You will prepare an annotated bibliography that provides a one-paragraph introduction to your research topic and then lists and annotates eight credible and authoritative sources that you could use in your researched argument. At least three of these sources must be peer-reviewed journal articles. Your purpose is to establish that you have done the necessary research and have found authoritative sources that you could use in your researched argument. Your readers include the professor and other students in the class, so you need to write the annotations for such readers (not experts on the selected topic).

For each source listed in your annotated bibliography, include the following:

Complete bibliographic information for each source in MLA or APA documentation style (alphabetize the sources by author’s last name).

A one-paragraph annotation of each source in which you—

Summarize the source’s overall content, including main ideas and conclusions.

Analyze the source’s authoritativeness (authority, accuracy, currency, objectivity, and/or coverage), and acknowledge limitations of the source.

Evaluate the source’s usefulness and relevance to your researched argument topic; indicate how you will use the source or how it contributes to your research.

Plan for Researched Argument (25 points)

You will provide an overall plan for your researched argument, including the following:

Identify what background information and explanation you will need to provide for your readers (describe what you need to provide, not what you will provide).

Present your tentative thesis and identify the type(s) of claim that it is (factual, policy, causal, value).

Provide a tentative outline for your researched argument (in outline or paragraph form).

Identify the major supporting points for your thesis and the evidence you have to support them.

Indicate the opposing ideas to your thesis and describe how you will deal with them.

Researched Argument (300 points)

After you have completed your research and all preliminary assignments, you will write a 2000-word researched argument essay that persuasively presents a thesis that makes a claim about an issue related to your topic. You must support your ideas with evidence cited from at least eight authoritative and credible sources, including at least three peer-reviewed journal articles, as well as scholarly books, government documents, specialized magazine articles, and/or interviews with experts. Make your position stronger by bringing up opposing ideas and either refuting them or minimizing their importance. Provide in-text citations within the essay to cite all paraphrases, quotations, and summaries, using MLA or APA. Provide a list of all sources that you cite within the essay (Works Cited for MLA or References for APA). Your list of sources should include only those sources you actually cite within the essay, and it should not include annotations. You may use additional or different sources than you included in your annotated bibliography, and you do not need to annotate them.

Purpose: Persuasively present a claim on your selected topic.

Audience: Professor of the class and other students in the class who are college-level readers, but may not be familiar with your specific research topic.

Use an essay format with an introduction (introduce topic and present thesis), body (develop and support thesis), and closing (reiterate the thesis and provide a sense of completeness).

Provide a controlling thesis that presents your central claim and support it with authoritative evidence drawn from at least eight sources, including three peer-reviewed journal articles.

Bring up opposing ideas and deal with them persuasively.

Format: Length: 2000 words; typed and double spaced; standard font; numbered pages; standard heading with name, course, and date at top left hand on first page for MLA or title page for APA (title, author, date). Use MLA or APA, providing in-text citations and a list of sources.

*Possible Topics: Select one of the following topics and find an issue within that topic that you could research:

The Pandemic (impact of, reasons for, vaccinations, government response to, masks, etc.)

Obesity (childhood, adult, U.S., world, causes, solutions, government’s role, nutrition, exercise)

Social Media (marketing tool, impact of, socialization, communication, role in society, future)

Education (bullying, standardized testing, bilingual education, use of technology, effectiveness)

Technology (impact on jobs, workplace, individuals, family, environment, schools, role of)

Personal Communication Devices (addiction to, socialization, distracted driving, use in classrooms, texting)

Internet Security (hacking, identity theft, online transactions) and privacy

Video Games (effects of, applications of, addiction to, gender-based issues, positives, negatives)

Marketing.docx

Toyota Environmental Analysis

Tracell Smith

AIU

03/10/2022

Part one:

Toyota Inc. is one of the leading automobile manufacturers globally. The company has its headquarters in Japan and currently run warehouses and production assemblies in various regions such as Japan, United States and Europe (Colias & Rogers, 2022). It is the leading motor vehicle manufacturers in terms of global sales and the product range.

Finance and accounting affects marketing pans since departments are responsible for providing necessary funds needed for marketing and sales. The economics affects marketing plan since it helps the company determine the cost efficient marketing strategy based on economic and marketing condition. The management is responsible about marketing decision making and selecting the best marketing practice and sometimes the company cans elect the marketing plans without caring out financial implications.

Environmental Analysis

Political factors: Toyota has global operations hence political stability in countries such as Africa and Ukraine is currently affecting its sales. The government implementation of ecofriendly practices is also affecting the sales of Toyota fleet that are mainly fossil fueled.

Economic: The economic conditions due to Covid 19, pandemic affected 2020 and 2021 sales. The value of Yen is weaker than the dollar hence Toyota fetches higher prices in Europe and America (Colias & Rogers, 2022). The rise of new market such as middle East is also influencing Toyota sales

Social: the increasing interest in hybrid and electric cars which is promoted buy sustainability culture is creating new opportunities for Toyota to invest in electric car segment (Mainwaring, 2018). Toyota already gains more sales from its hybrid cars.

Technological: The rise of e-commerce is helping Toyota gain more sales and reduce expenses related to warehousing and showrooms. It also creates a perfect avenue for marketing hence targeting many audiences at once.

Ecological: The climate change, the declining oil reserves and global emphasis on sustainability is creating new markets for Toyota hybrid and electric cars.

Legal: The increased adoption of intellectual property laws helps Toyota to protect its IPs from theft and earn more from them (Lahiri, 2021). Consumers laws also affects the company negatively and positively.

References

Colias, M., & Rogers, C. (2022, January 4). Toyota overtakes GM as Bestselling auto maker in U.S. WSJ. 

Lahiri, A. (2021, October 14). Nippon steel alleges Toyota motor of patent infringement: WSJ. Yahoo Finance – Stock Market Live, Quotes, Business & Finance News. 

Mainwaring, S. (2018, November 13). Purpose At Work: How Toyota is Driving Growth, Innovation and Impact. Forbes. 

marketingwork.docx

3

Toyota Pricing Strategy and Branding

Tracell Smith

Cale Hall

AIU

03/18/2022

Toyota offers both products and services. The products offered by Toyota include cars, cars’ spare parts such as engines, electronics, batteries, stamping dies, air conditioning compressors, and many more. The company also sells material handling equipment such as forklifts. Finally, Toyota deals in textile machinery used to manufacture car seats and other materials. Toyota enjoys a positive brand reputation usually associated with its logo and symbols. The company has a log that is uniquely recognized by many vehicle enthusiasts. The unique red color has also contributed to its brand reputation and recognition. Toyota enjoys a positive brand association and is considered one of the most preferred brands globally.

The Toyota pricing strategy is based on competition, geography, segments, and demand. The prices are flexible based on the region and demands. Toyota prices its products based on regions; in some continents, the process may be lower to attract demand, while in other places, the prices may depend on competitor pricing. Toyota appeals to both price and quality buyers. Toyota has high-end cars such as Lexus and Prado, Land cruiser which prices differently due to the quality of the cars.

My pricing strategy for the Toyota cars would be based on quality and performance. This involves developing a price for all cars in a specific category and using that price globally. This will ensure Toyota gains equal revenues from all global markets and avoid price discrimination based on region (Dolgui & Proth, 2019). Cars in the same class may have different prices based on their features and performances. Toyota’s pricing strategy is effective since it is the leading seller of cars globally. The company is also competing with other luxury brands and has the upper hand in delivering luxury cars.

Reference

Dolgui, A., & Proth, J. M. (2019). Pricing strategies and models. Annual Reviews in Control34(1), 101-110.

Warehouse Management – Case Study 3

case study attached. Read it and answer below

1)Write a short OVERVIEW of the case (1 page)

2)ANALYSIS – Describe and analyze the benefits of LPTs partnership with ATMS.( 1 page)

3)LESSONS LEARNED – List and explain (1 page)

Directions for the case assignment: It must include one title page (5 points) and one set of references for the entire assignment. APA style preferred (5 points). Use each of the major headings as shown. Subheadings as necessary are acceptable to give better organization to the case analysis (5 points). Answers must show command of the concepts and theory. 

BPandtheDeepwaterHorizonDisasterCaseStudyandAssignment12.docx

Public vs. Private

 

Think of a public organization with which you are familiar. Explain how it differs from a private company in terms of the following:

 Nature of its service.

 Relationship between its budget and collective bargaining processes.

 Bargaining structure and decision-making processes.

 Negotiable issues and bargaining tactics.

 The right to strike

The requirements below must be met for your paper to be accepted and graded:

 Write between 750 1,250 words (approximately 3 5 pages) using Microsoft Word in APA style.

 Use font size 12 and 1 margins.

 Include cover page and reference page.

 At least 80% of your paper must be original content/writing.

 No more than 20% of your content/information may come from references.

Use an appropriate number of references to support your position, and defend your arguments. The following are examples of primary and secondary sources that may be used, and non-credible and opinion based sources that may not be used.

1.  Primary sources such as government websites (, , , etc.), peer reviewed and scholarly journals in EBSCOhost (Grantham University Online Library) and .

2.  Secondary and credible sources such as, , The , trade journals, and publications in EBSCOhost (Grantham University Online Library).

3.  Non-credible and opinion based sources such as, Wikis, Yahoo Answers, eHow, blogs, etc. should not be used.

Cite all reference material (data, dates, graphs, quotes, paraphrased statements, information, etc.) in the paper and list each source on a reference page using APA style.