Paper instructions:
This gets the student-researcher started on articulating research topic and gathering sources, gives chance for early feedback re feasibility, refinement and direction. Should be a 6-10 page roadmap of what the student intends to research, methodology of research, the issues it raises and how the research paper will be organised.

Thesis: Animal Welfare Act New Zealand, how can New Zealand better enforce animal welfare standards?

Following are the subheadings/plan for the proposal

-Thesis Statement
-Current Animal law legislation
-how NZ enforces animal welfare currently
-What are the NZ animal welfare issues
-compare it globally e.g. china – and a country with good animal welfare enforcement
-International standards/treaties
– how we can use examples from other countries and international standards/treaties for NZ
– The resources I will use in my research
– what i want to achieve in the research and how i will adapt if the research goes another direction

Read the attach worksheet and answer the questions.
Vid1:    https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=7&v=JHIYMBsBNLM&feature=emb_title. 
20/20 What Happened to Jackie? | UVA Rape Case [2020 Full Doc]

Vid2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=6jMhMVEjEQg&feature=emb_title
The Dangers Of Social Media (Child Predator Experiment)

In this assignment, you will be exploring tasks that an actual crime scene investigator might accomplish.

There has been a murder in which it is clear that a person riding a mountain bike on the side of a dirt country road was intentionally struck down by a suspect. The suspect then stepped out of his or her vehicle and shot the biker.

A witness riding an ATV heard the shot and came on the scene just in time to see the suspect kick the victim hard a couple of times, presumably to determine if he or she was dead.

You have executed a warrant for the shoes of the driver/shooter and obtained the shoes worn by the suspect for examination.

Select a pair of shoes from your personal wardrobe, or borrow a pair from someone else. It is important that you select shoes that are at least 6 months old and are worn often (new shoes will not have much evidence on them. Using a household magnifying glass and a strong white light sourceeither a desk lamp or flashlightclosely examine the pair of shoes you selected.
Identify 3 or 4 items from the soles of the shoes, and explain in a 35-page paper how you conducted your examination, the type of items you found, their possible significance to the crime scene, and how you would recover and package the evidence you found.
Note: The following are just suggestions and are not mandatory for your paper grade. You may find this an instructive exercise.

You may have access to an ultraviolet light source like the ones used for identifying water marks on money and checks, commonly found at cashiers stations. Wear a pair of yellow glasses used as sporting glasses for skiing and shooting. This is just an extra suggestion and is not mandatory for the assignment.

You may also photograph items you have found and attach the photos to the paper if you care to. If you decide to photograph the items, do it on a piece of white bond paperthe photos will turn out better.

Assignment Details

Trace evidence consists of small items of material largely made up of human and animal hair, cloth fibers (natural and synthetic), items such as geological soil, small glass particles, pollen, wood splinters, gunshot residue, and small smears or flecks of paint. These items are found throughout many crime scenes and are often overlooked or lost.

Explain to your CSI partner in training the methods of finding trace evidence, cautions on not losing or destroying it, and collection methods.
Relate to your partner the components of human hair that are considered class characteristics.
Further, explain how the Locard Principle plays a major part in the transfer of trace evidence and the importance of identifying and collecting it for the investigation.

In the discussion for this unit, you explored the documentary Child of Rage, with an emphasis on finding best practices and the importance of forensic protocols in structuring interviews. In this activity, your task is to find 5 examples of real-life cases reflecting interviews using poor forensic practice. In finding these examples, place an emphasis on cases involving children, adults, and the elderly. Supply a summary of the case, proper documentation of the location of the case, the specific errors in protocol, and what happened in the case. This review will be 3 pages.

The specific steps are as follows:

Conduct independent research finding 5 examples of real-life cases reflecting interviews using poor forensic practice.
Of the 5 examples, at least 1 must include a case involving a child, 1 involving an adult, and 1 involving an elderly individual.
Write a report including the following sections:
Introduction to the report
Overview of the importance of proper interviewing protocol
2 paragraphs documenting each example of a real-life case
1 paragraph conclusion
Include no fewer than 6 scholarly resources.
Ensure the report is at least 4 pages long.

Assignment Details

In learning new skills, a helpful strategy is finding examples of poor and best practices. In this lesson, you reviewed the latest research on conducting forensic interviews of children and examined the latest National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Investigative Interview Protocol. Before participating this discussion, watch the documentary Child of Rage and then engage in a conversation on the development of NICHD Investigative Interview Protocol.

Having watched the documentary, identify three different specific points in the documentary where you might have done something different? Please indicate the specific time point within the video, so others are able to view the segment and discuss your assessment. In replying to other students, how might that strategy have changed the trajectory of the forensic interview?

In your responses to classmates, explain why you agree or disagree with their assessment.

References

Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y., Hershkowitz, I., Esplin, E. W., & Horowitz, D. (2007). Structured forensic interview protocols improve the quality and informativeness of investigative interviews with children: A review of research using the NICHD Investigative Interview Protocol. Child Abuse and Neglect, 31(11-12), 1201-1231. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2180422/?ref=driverlayer.com

MarkLegg87. (2011, October 18). Child of rage the full documentary [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2-Re_Fl_L4

Your paper must be a minimum of 1500 words, conforming to APA standards (6th Ed), and not counting the title, abstract or reference page.  You must have a minimum of 5 scholarly sources to support your commentary.  Refer to your syllabus and rubric for guidance.
The Boston Marathon attack was unexpected (or was it?).  The emergency response teams from every conceivable organization mobilized very quickly.  The city was on lock down in an unprecedented amount of time.  Cell phone towers were out of service within minutes (bombs can be remote detonated with cell phones).

*Required Reading
-Ensuring the cybersecurity of the Nation. (2019). GAO.gov. Retrieved from https://www.gao.gov/highrisk/ensuring_the_security_federal_government_information_systems/why_did_study

-Resolution 2341 of United Nations Security Council on the protection of critical infrastructure from terrorist attacks. (2017). Derechos.org. Retrieved from http://www.derechos.org/terrorism/doc/unterror54.html

-What is container security initiative (CSI) and how does it work? (2016). Retrieved from http://www.marineinsight.com/marine-safety/what-is-container-security-initiative-csi-and-how-does-it-work/

*Required Websites
-International Engagement Results, DHS. https://www.dhs.gov/international-engagement-results
Click International Partnerships and review the list of agreements.

-International Strategy for Disaster Reduction, UN. http://www.unisdr.org/

Assignment
After reading the required literature, comment on two of the following:
Read Resolution 2341 of United Nations Security Council on the protection of critical infrastructure from terrorist attacks. Answer the following: Who are the member countries of the UNSC? Comment on the UNSCs handling of Irans nuclear program.
Go to required website: International Engagement Results, Department of Homeland Security. Click International Partnerships. From the list of agreements, pick one and comment, using examples such as an agreement with a specific country.
Read What Is Container Security Initiative (CSI) and How Does It Work? Answer the following: What are the possible ways shipping containers pose a security risk? A critical infrastructure risk?
Comment on the most recent natural or man-made disaster and the effects on critical infrastructure, answering: When? Where? What? Why? How?
Assignment Expectations
Length: This Case Assignment should be at least 3 pages, not counting the title page and references.  Paper format: (a) Cover page, (b) Header, (c) Body. Including an Abstract page/opening. The abstract begins on a new page and includes the page header. The word Abstract (no bold, italics, underlining) is centered on the first line of the page.
On the next line begins a brief yet succinct summary (abstract) of the main points of the paper. The summary is a single double-spaced paragraph and is not indented. It is typically between 150 and 250 words and includes the research topic, research questions, participants, methods, results, data analysis, and conclusions. Please ensure to incorporate an introductory (different from abstract) and concluding paragraph.

References: At least two references should be included from academic sources (e.g., peer-reviewed journal articles). Required readings are included. Quoted material should not exceed 10% of the total paper (since the focus of these assignments is critical thinking). Use your own words and build on the ideas of others. When material is copied verbatim from external sources, it MUST be enclosed in quotes. The references should be cited within the text and also listed at the end of the assignment in the References section (preferably in APA format).

Organization: Subheadings should be used to organize your paper according to question.

Grammar and Spelling: While no points are deducted for minor errors, assignments are expected to adhere to standards guidelines of grammar, spelling, punctuation, and sentence syntax. Points may be deducted if grammar and spelling impact clarity.

Final Project Guidelines
Profile of a Leader
As a future public administrator, you will want to familiarize yourself with what constitutes excellence in public and nonprofit sector leadership. In this Final Project, you write a profile of a leader who may or may not embody these characteristics of excellence. To do so, select an individual who is especially interesting to you and use what you have explored in this course as a foundation. You may select any contemporary leader of a public (e.g., government), or nonprofit organization (including your own organization) as long as it is someone for whom there is sufficient information to provide an effective analysis of successful management and leadership in public and nonprofit organizations. The leader you interview can function at any management level of the organization, from supervisor to president of the board of trustees.
The Final Project 
(1518 pages, not including title page and references)
The Final Project is a synthesis of the elements of successful leadership covered in the weekly assignments, including any recommendations given by the Instructor and student colleagues.  The Final Project is to be completed in three parts:
Week 1: Interview Consent Form
Secure the permission to interview your selected leader in the public or nonprofit sector for your Final Project using the Interview Consent Form provided in this weeks Learning Resources. The Interview Consent Form should be submitted in Week 4 along with the Final Project Proposal.
Week 4: Final Project Proposal 
Submit a 2- to 3-page paper describing the leader you propose to interview and why you chose this leader. Also submit a list of interview questions you have created to ask him or her. Submit no later than Day 7 of Week 4. Incorporate Instructor feedback into your Final Project in Week 10. 
Note: Together with the leader you are interviewing, you will create a pseudonym to protect his or her confidentiality, and inform the interviewee that his or her real name will not be used. In addition, no personal information other than professional credentials (e.g., education, leadership role, job history) will be shared either in this proposal or the Final Project.