In approximately 2-3 paragraphs per question please answer the questions provided. All cited material must include both internal citations and a complete reference page at the end of the paper. A cover sheet should minimally indicate the case study number (3), the name of the course, student name and date.

Please view the 9-plus minute clip and respond to the following questions:

1. Describe the budget deal made by members of Congress in order to avoid the fiscal cliff at the beginning of 2013.

2. What other budget deals loom ahead for members of Congress in 2013? Describe the problems/issues involved and impacts on government services and on individual Americans (hint: one of these issues is the federal government sequestration.)

3. What solutions were considered by the panel for federal deficit and debt reduction rather than continuing to make temporary fixes (i.e. kicking the can down the road)

This case study must be free of any plagiarism.

Your task is to contemplate some of the most common contributors or causes to personal workplace stress and how this stress affects your performance. After you have done this, review some of the stress management methods that have been discussed in this unit (or through your own research) that you have not implemented before and that are of particular interest to you.

Next, extend the relationships between stress mitigation and creativity development practices that you have not implemented before or that interest you. How can enhancing your creativity help with stress mitigation? Explain.

Finally, develop a reflection paper where you review the contemplated contributors and express your thoughts on the general effectiveness and viability of the management tactic(s) selected.

The reflection should be at least two pages in length, be double-spaced, and be written in 12-point Times New Roman font. Outside sources and references are not required; however, if you do utilize information from an outside source, make certain to appropriately cite your source.. Remember to write in 3rd person APA style

Topic – Florida’s Hazardous waste disposal

Describe how you would plan/propose to evaluate the policy or program by employing the methods, techniques, etc., which are covered in the course text. Do not evaluate the policy or program, you are only expected to describe how you would go about evaluating the policy or program.

Your proposal should address the following questions or issues. In all cases, defend or justify your answers or procedures, especially with specific references to relevant concepts, ideas, or passages in the assigned readings for the course, as well as to the references which you may have found in your library search. This assignment is not based on opinions, therefore academic sources must be utilized, and it ought to be written in the third person.

Each of the items in CAPS must be listed as a heading or a sub-heading in your evaluation proposal. If a question/issue does not apply, please explain why. The final product must include the following:

    Cover Page (consult an APA style guide)

    ABSTRACT (no more than 1 page, gives a brief overview of the contents of your paper, the abstract is written last after you have completed your entire paper)

    INTRODUCTION (2-3 pages in length)
    o    Include your thesis statement in first or second paragraph.
    o    Describe or summarize the policy or program which you intend to evaluate.
    o    What are the goals or desired outcomes of the policy or program?
    o    Why are the goals or outcomes important?
    o    Include your research questions at the end of the introduction.

    LITERATURE REVIEW (3-5 pages in length)
    o    This section of your paper corresponds directly to your research questions. Each question should be reflected in sub-headings in your literature review. If you dont have a research question about it dont include it in your paper.
    o    How have other researchers attempted to evaluate the policy or program? What were their conclusions? What might be replicated in your evaluation?
    o    What theory or theories connect the policy or program to its goals or desired outcomes?

    METHODOLOGY (2-4 pages in length, this is how you are going to evaluate this program/policy in the future)
    o    Of all evaluation techniques you have learned in the course which one will you use
to evaluate your policy or program?
    o    Is an experimental design relevant to your evaluation? If so, how? What form? If not, why not?
    o    Is your evaluation a process evaluation or an outcome evaluation? Why? How?
    o    What are the principal components of your evaluation design?
    o    STUDY VARIABLES
            Name your dependent, independent, and control variables.
    o    DATA COLLECTION
          Name your unit(s) of analysis.
          How do you propose to measure the factors, variables, goals, or outcomes which are relevant to your evaluation?
          What are the advantages and disadvantages of your proposed measures?
    o    SAMPLING and SURVEY INSTRUMENTS
          What are the principal sources of data and information which you propose to employ?
          What are the advantages and disadvantages of your proposed sources?
    o    DATA ANALYSIS
          How do you propose to analyze and to interpret the data and information which you collect? In other words, how will your analysis and/or interpretation show that the policy or program goals or outcomes have or have not been achieved?

    CONCLUSION (2-3 pages in length)
    o    Analyze what you have learned and inform the reader.
    o    What policy or programmatic recommendations might emerge from your evaluation?

    REFERENCES (must be in APA style, not all citation generation programs will produce a correct APA reference page, you must double check)