Students research and prepare a 12-15 page, APA formatted paper, including title page, abstract and reference page(s). The paper will provide demonstrated knowledge of the 6 pillars of public administration. Discussion within the paper will include all 6 pillars of PA, including a connection to leadership theory for each pillar, then practical application and connection of the pillars/theory to PA leadership.  The paper must be written with sound discussion at the doctoral level, including correct grammar, demonstrated understanding of topic / and correct use of PA, theory and leadership terminology. A faith integration section must be include

The six pillars to be analyzed are
1. The politics/administration dichotomy
2. Accountability
3. Legitimacy
4. Equity/Fairness
5.Representation/Responsibility
6. Efficiency/ Effectiveness

-The exemplary paper demonstrates and articulates interpretation of organizational systems including administrative functions and policy maker (legislative) leadership processes. The exemplary paper expresses detailed analysis, synthesis and explanation of legitimate power in organizational systems.

-The exemplary paper demonstrates the writers ability to define and describe the political-administrative dichotomy / paradigm and compare / contrast key political and administrative actors in the public systems. The exemplary paper demonstrates doctoral level research and analysis.

-The exemplary paper demonstrates clear doctoral level explanation of social equity in American public administration and its overall importance / application to public organizations. The exemplary paper shows evidence of prediction of how moral leadership contributes to inspiring leaders in the advancement of social equity.

-The exemplary paper combines public sector and business leadership practices in evaluating their impact on public sector organizations. The exemplary paper demonstrates evidence of case study analysis to identify and evaluate leadership efficiency, effectiveness, accountability and legitimacy. The writer has correctly utilized the 6 pillars of PA to construct the paper.

-The exemplary paper develops a central theme of how a Christian World View provides guidance for leadership in the public arena. The paper provides depth in faith integration.

-Evidence of exemplary research techniques that clearly demonstrates depth of effort, quality of research and appropriate to topic dynamics, including faith integration. Includes a minimum of 8 peer reviewed references (books, articles) in alphabetical order with flawless APA formatting.

The APA defines “adjudication” to mean the “agency process for the formulation of an order.” Adjudication can be formal or informal and includes all final agency action other than rulemaking. In addition to an agency’s adjudicatory power, Congress may also authorize an agency to use rulemaking powers to further its regulatory agenda. Agency rules, also known as regulations, are much more encompassing than adjudications as they are intended to apply to the general public.

For this assignment, answer the following questions:
Explain agency adjudication and explain the difference between informal and formal adjudication.

Explain agency rulemaking and explain the difference between informal and formal rulemaking.

Provide an example of a case where an agency employed either adjudication, rulemaking, or both.

Your document should be at least 2 pages, double-spaced, but no more than 3 pages.

Please use 3 scholarly sources and cite relevant statutes and laws in proper format

Note on Primary Assignments:
Each week you will submit a Primary Assignment. In many weeks, you can choose between two options for this assignment. Before you opt for which assignment option to answer, you will want to consider which option affords you the best opportunity to demonstrate learning based upon the assigned course materials. All Primary Assignments include a thesis statement, a bibliography (APA style), and the use and citation of three assigned reading articles from the current week and one assigned reading article from a previous week.

Engaged Citizen Hall of Fame
Learning Objective: Applying American Values: You apply the values studied by nominating to the Values and Service Hall of Fame, an individual from your personal life who, in your opinion, exemplifies them.

Throughout history, there have been women and men who exhibited exemplary behavior. We often look to famous people as role models and build statues or post plaques in their honor. Life is, however, full of often unheralded lives that have demonstrated positive values and engaged citizenship. Whether its Miguel Keith, an 18-year-old Hispanic Marine from Omaha who was posthumously awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor for bravery in combat, or the Civil Rights leader and Nebraska Hall of Fame member, Standing Bear, or perhaps someone you know, there are many role models in society.

This weeks assignment is to nominate someone you know to the fictitious, Engaged Citizenship Hall of Fame. For this assignment, consider the values presented in the assigned reading articles from Week 1 through Week 6. Compose an appropriate tribute arguing that this persons behavior exhibited one or more of the values examined in the course. If possible, include a photograph or some other appropriate image to represent the person you are nominating. Avoid overly hyperbolic or emotive attributes.

This Weeks Required Reading / Videos
https://www.vox.com/summer-movies/2018/5/17/17343442/avengers-infinity-war-captain-america-thanos-sequel-moral-dilemma
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xt0Fv0W-CSo&feature=youtu.be
http://theconversation.com/how-the-moral-lessons-of-to-kill-a-mockingbird-endure-today-100763
https://sites.psu.edu/psy533wheeler/2017/02/07/psy-533-unit-01-the-role-of-ethics-in-president-abraham-lincolns-abolishment-of-slavery/
https://www.hoover.org/research/rugged-individualism
https://law.scu.edu/sports-law/rooting-for-complicated-heroes-its-complicated/
https://law.scu.edu/sports-law/when-in-doubt-and-theres-always-doubt-be-your-best/
https://positivepsychology.com/classification-character-strengths-virtues/
Chapter 1: American Governance in Theory and Action, Bowdoin College, 2015

Previous Week Required Reading / Videos
https://archive.org/details/JusticeWhatIsTheRightThingToDoByMichaelSandel/page/n97
http://www.africa.upenn.edu/Articles_Gen/Letter_Birmingham.html
https://democracyjournal.org/magazine/18/why-we-must-judge/
http://cyberspacei.com/greatbooks/h2/6gi/gi_024.htm
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Madison/01-10-02-0178
https://hbr.org/2017/01/true-leaders-believe-dissent-is-an-obligation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MuiazbyOSqQ&feature=youtu.be
https://youtu.be/-AwNKQqLESc
https://www.twopartyopera.com/comic/lock-them-up/
https://youtu.be/MuiazbyOSqQ

In weeks one through ten, you have a subjective video assignment. Watch this video and post a minimum 100-word response discussing your thoughts and feelings. These videos introduce ideas which may or may not coincide with the weeks learning objective or theme.
    Why do you think this video was chosen to be included in this course?
    For this assignment, you do not need to provide citations or quotes.
    You may write your response in a first-person voice.
    You are strongly encouraged to use the Grammarly app before posting your assignment.

Watch the following video:
    Chapter 1: American Governance in Theory and Action, Bowdoin College, 2015

This Weeks Required Reading / Videos
https://www.vox.com/summer-movies/2018/5/17/17343442/avengers-infinity-war-captain-america-thanos-sequel-moral-dilemma
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xt0Fv0W-CSo&feature=youtu.be
http://theconversation.com/how-the-moral-lessons-of-to-kill-a-mockingbird-endure-today-100763
https://sites.psu.edu/psy533wheeler/2017/02/07/psy-533-unit-01-the-role-of-ethics-in-president-abraham-lincolns-abolishment-of-slavery/
https://www.hoover.org/research/rugged-individualism
https://law.scu.edu/sports-law/rooting-for-complicated-heroes-its-complicated/
https://law.scu.edu/sports-law/when-in-doubt-and-theres-always-doubt-be-your-best/
https://positivepsychology.com/classification-character-strengths-virtues/
Chapter 1: American Governance in Theory and Action, Bowdoin College, 2015

Previous Week Required Reading / Videos
https://archive.org/details/JusticeWhatIsTheRightThingToDoByMichaelSandel/page/n97
http://www.africa.upenn.edu/Articles_Gen/Letter_Birmingham.html
https://democracyjournal.org/magazine/18/why-we-must-judge/
http://cyberspacei.com/greatbooks/h2/6gi/gi_024.htm
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Madison/01-10-02-0178
https://hbr.org/2017/01/true-leaders-believe-dissent-is-an-obligation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MuiazbyOSqQ&feature=youtu.be
https://youtu.be/-AwNKQqLESc
https://www.twopartyopera.com/comic/lock-them-up/
https://youtu.be/MuiazbyOSqQ

This week we read about character and making moral choices. One form of moral decision making is utilitarianism, and another is Kants ethical imperative. Historical exposs find that many who are held up as role models were in reality as fallible as the rest of us including Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, Gandhi, and Martin Luther King.

For your assignment, this week, reconcile the reality that often moral leaders were also flawed. Should we set aside their moral failings and focus on the immense positive contributions they made?

Operational Assignment Details:

This assignment is due on Sunday at 10 p.m. CST. Your substantive comments are due the following Tuesday at 10 p.m. CST. Each journal entry should be a minimum of 300 words. Your journal entry narrative is subjective and can be written in the first person. Citations are not required, but the inclusion of the assigned reading articles is strongly encouraged. Be sure to proofread your entry and use the Grammarly app before posting. Please keep in mind that others will be reading your journal.

This Weeks Required Reading / Videos
https://www.vox.com/summer-movies/2018/5/17/17343442/avengers-infinity-war-captain-america-thanos-sequel-moral-dilemma
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xt0Fv0W-CSo&feature=youtu.be
http://theconversation.com/how-the-moral-lessons-of-to-kill-a-mockingbird-endure-today-100763
https://sites.psu.edu/psy533wheeler/2017/02/07/psy-533-unit-01-the-role-of-ethics-in-president-abraham-lincolns-abolishment-of-slavery/
https://www.hoover.org/research/rugged-individualism
https://law.scu.edu/sports-law/rooting-for-complicated-heroes-its-complicated/
https://law.scu.edu/sports-law/when-in-doubt-and-theres-always-doubt-be-your-best/
https://positivepsychology.com/classification-character-strengths-virtues/
Chapter 1: American Governance in Theory and Action, Bowdoin College, 2015

Previous Week Required Reading / Videos
https://archive.org/details/JusticeWhatIsTheRightThingToDoByMichaelSandel/page/n97
http://www.africa.upenn.edu/Articles_Gen/Letter_Birmingham.html
https://democracyjournal.org/magazine/18/why-we-must-judge/
http://cyberspacei.com/greatbooks/h2/6gi/gi_024.htm
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Madison/01-10-02-0178
https://hbr.org/2017/01/true-leaders-believe-dissent-is-an-obligation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MuiazbyOSqQ&feature=youtu.be
https://youtu.be/-AwNKQqLESc
https://www.twopartyopera.com/comic/lock-them-up/
https://youtu.be/MuiazbyOSqQ

Hello there, we are almost at the end of this journey.  Once again, thank you again in advance.  Please read the below in its entirety.

Requesting Chapters 4 and 5 of the Thesis.

Please see the instructions for each chapter.

Chapter IV:  Results  (requesting 8 pages)

This chapter includes a presentation and analysis of the data.  The tone of the subject is purely objective, devoid of assumptions and interpretations.

Following a summary of the research data, Chapter IV should be organized in manner consistent with the research hypotheses: 

First:  present data related to the first hypotheses
Second:  Analyze those data to determine whether the first hypotheses can be supported or rejected.  Follow this sequence for each hypotheses (4).
Include table (s) to present quantitative data.  Qualitative data should be summarized, as opposed to verbatim transcriptions.

I think part of Chapter 4 was included in Chapter 3.  I will attached all 3 previous chapters for your recollection.

Chapter V:  Discussion, Conclusions, and Recommendations (requesting 8 pages)

This chapter includes:
(a)    A Discussion of the research thesis hypotheses, including the findings, interpretation of the results, and problems and/or limitations; followed by
(b)    A Conclusion:  What did we find out?  What did we learn?
(c)    Recommendations for changes in policy or practice, future research, or anything else that will direction solutions to the problem (s) that were the focus of the research.

Finally, the professor is telling me that my references are not correctly cited and not in the proper APA format. I am attaching the previous 3 Chapters references (4 pages) as a separate attachment. 

Can you please review each reference for correct format?  The professor says he dont know what references are books or journals because page numbers are not included where they needed to be included for Journals/Periodicals.  I have to know what part of the reference that needs to be italicize.  He said some references are missing the cities and states of publication and the publishing companies.
He will not accept my thesis if the references are not complicated.  Can you please put a B for Book, J for Journal, D for Dissertation and whatever source of reference you may have utilize. 

Your work is great but I will hate to fail my thesis because of the references.  Thank you very much.    Look forward to communicating with you over the next 2 plus weeks.

How should the United States government deal with the heightened concern about homegrown violent extremism and the growing concern for the preservation of civil liberties? What are the political and constitutional consequences of counter-terrorism? Lastly, how do we assess the tradeoffs between freedom and security?

You must separate each aspect of the question into different paragraphs and incorporate headers to differentiate the various aspects. Failure to do so will cost you five points.

Review the autopsy photos. Create a story detailing how you believe that the victim died. You are required to do research using 4 outside sources. You cannot use papers or books written by any professors from FGCU to support your position. I want to know what other researchers say about the subject.

There are four (4) aspects of the research paper:
The paper must be a minimum of 1000 words.