chapter four only review:
(provided that the offer content includes the following points:
(1) Introduction: the title and general theme of the book
(2) Topics: What were the main topics investigated in the book?
(3) Arguments: What are the arguments and assumptions regarding the main themes? Be sure to select
Differences / similarities.
Analysis: What are your thoughts on the book? Are the topics appropriate? Do you agree with any conclusions
Or arguments presented? Are there any contemporary events that contradict or reinforce the arguments of the book?
(5) Conclusion: related concluding comments on the book.
Category: Law
policy making
650-4
NOTE: before you start I need you to sent me a DRAFT OUTLINE first.
Section 7: Cross-Domain Strategies
Examine the potential for public or private partnerships and interagency efficiencies in addressing All-Domain Awareness (ADA) challenges and coordinated efforts in the land, air, maritime, and cyber domains in the unique homeland security environment of the Southwest border (SWB).
Although this strategy has a counternarcotics focus, the SWB represents a multithreat, multidomain, multiagency challenge that poses significant challenges for homeland security planners because of the asymmetric and interconnected nature of regional crime networks and cross-border violence. For this assignment, complete the following:
- Prepare a 1-page quad chart and a 1-page supporting document that explains the planning variables associated with cross-domain strategies.
- Draw heavily from the relevant chapters of the NSWBCN Strategy, leveraging the substantive work that has been done by policymakers at the national level.
Section 8: International Factors
This week, you will identify and detail the potential international players, including the role of the Department of State, President Obamas SWB Security Bill, the Merida Initiative, and support by nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), along with counterparts in Mexico.
Scenario
Your boss is attending a planning conference in Mexico City where ideas are being requested to improve cooperation with Mexico. Prepare a 2-page thought piece to help her prepare her remarks. In this piece, address the following:
- What diplomatic, informational, military, and economic variables will enable improved theater security cooperation (TSC), building partner capacity (BPC) and international engagement?
- Incorporate relevant information from the case study, empirical data regarding SWB security statistics, and useful material from the NSWBCN Strategy document.
- Include useful and appropriate bibliographic references.
Review the Key Assignment description in the Week 1 Individual Project.
For assistance, listen to the Cross-Domain Strategies Webinar that is available in this Phase’s MUSE.
Section 9: Interagency Process
This week, you will outline the potential for improved whole-of-government, interagency coordination among domestic and international partners. In this section of your Key Assignment, you will identify the framework for a possible policy planning effort that would serve as a catalyst for improved multiagency, cross-governmental cooperation and collaboration at the SWB.
Draft a 2-page road map, similar to the plan of action and milestones (POA&M) or concept of operations (CONOPS). Be sure to include the following:
- Propose steps to significantly raise the level of coordination among the constellation of interagency players at the SWB.
- Draw from your case study, NSWBCN Strategy, and the Patriot Act to formulate a plan of action that leverages existing capabilities and introduces new ideas.
- Identify at least 3 specific examples of potential for improvement versus transformation. For example, there are several coordination centers with overlapping missions that are colocated at the SWB that appear redundant.
- Include useful and appropriate bibliographic references.
Review the Key Assignment description in the Week 1 Individual Project.
Key Assignment Draft Requirements
Update your previous assignment formats to create a cohesive case study analysis and include all appropriate bibliographic references.
Your Key Assignment Draft and case study analysis should include the following:
- You should have an introduction to the project that highlights the strategic purpose for the NSWBCN Strategy and outlines your case study on the threat of WMD being smuggled across the Southwest Border.
- You should highlight the all-threat environment that exists on the SWB for the key stakeholders of the Interagency Police Committee (ICP) within the interagency.
- You should include a graphic diagram of the rules and policies that apply to the region, along with a list of overarching themes that summarize the challenges.
- You should write a point paper that emphasizes the need for better multiagency coordination on the SWB.
- You must include an executive outline of the specific chapters of the NSWBCN Strategy, and describe how they might support the state-level objectives of governors of the border states with homeland security equities on the SWB.
- You should write a policy proposal, explaining how SWB-related critical infrastructure protection (CIP), response, and resilience imperatives should be fully integrated into future versions of Department of Homeland Security (DHS) strategies and policies, with general recommendations that would be appropriate for DHS planners to consider.
- You should include a quad chart with supporting information that explains the planning variables associated with cross-domain strategies.
- You should write a thought piece on improving cooperation with Mexico.
- You will create a road map with proposed steps to significantly raise the level of coordination among the constellation of interagency players.
marine policy
Writing an analytical response to the reading, Responses should be no more than 2 double-spaced pages, 12-point font, 1-inch margins. Responses should briefly summarize the argument made by the reading, and analyze the information or perspective based on other sources (citing where necessary)
the first-page summary article, in general,
the second-page answering question “why matters?” “what interesting?”
Euthanasia. Comparison paper
Euthanasia
– Definition
What dose Euthanasia mean?
What does terminally ill mean?
What dose cureless disease mean?
– Historical information about euthanasia
Who is the first person used this word it? where? why?
– Types of Euthanasia
Active Euthanasia and Physician assisted suicide
Passive Euthanasia
– Reasons or issues have contributed to exercise euthanasia?
Such as Pain, Economic. And maybe other reasons.
– Euthanasia in Holland.
When it allowed euthanasia?
Why it allowed it?
its mechanisms and requirement?
Criminal Justice
Intro, breakdown and conclusion
PLEASE USE BOOK NO OUTSIDE SOURCES !!!
Definition of a Gang. (Cite Reference(s).)
Provide an example of a Gang.
How does knowing about Gangs assist the American Criminal Justice System in dealing with them if laws are violated?
Why or why not should the law be struck down as unconstitutional under the First Amendment?
Write a 1-2 page analysis that incorporates the concepts we have learned in class. Answer both questions based on your opinion and back your opinion by using constitutional analysis. This Essay must be typed, double spaced, in Times New Roman or similarly legible font, and 12-point font size.
Making the Most of What We Already Know
At a minimum, this critique should address the following questions or issues. If, in your opinion, your article does not address one or more of them, then you should say so and defend or justify why you believe that to be the case. In all cases, defend or justify your answers with specific references to words, phrases, or passages in the article and corresponding references to the assigned readings for the course. In other words, while your critique should be written in your own words (third person only), you do need to make references to specific words, phrases, and relevant passages in the text of your article, as well as corresponding references to the assigned readings for the course. Each of the following items in BOLD must be listed as a heading on your critique. Do not use bullet points. Discuss in your critique the questions/issues under each bolded item. If a question/issue does not apply, please explain why.
Summary (1-2 pages)
o Summarize the contents of your article.
o Who wanted the policy or program evaluated? In other words, why did the author(s) conduct the evaluation?
Evaluation Goal(s) (1 page)
o What were the goals or desired outcomes of the policy or program under examination?
o How did the author(s) propose to evaluate the policy or program in terms of its goals or outcomes?
Theoretical Perspective (2-3 paragraphs)
o What theory connects the policy or program to the goals or outcomes?
o What rival or plausible explanations or theories were ruled out?
o How did the theory guide the author(s) in their conduct of the evaluation?
Research Methods (2-3 paragraphs)
o What principal research method(s) did the author(s) use in the conduct of the evaluation?
o Did any unintended or unanticipated consequences arise? If so, what were they?
o How and why did they arise?
Conclusion (1 page)
o What did the author(s) conclude? On what basis?
o Did the policy or program achieve its intended goals or outcomes in whole, in part, or not at all? If so, why or why not?
o To what uses were the results of the evaluation to be put?
o Based on the results of the evaluation, what principal recommendations did the author(s) make?
Evaluation Concepts (1-2 pages)
o After you have written your summary, identify which of the following apply to the article. Be sure to define the concept and explain how each of your selections applies to your article.
Read chapters 11 – 14 from Joseph S. Wholey, Harry P. Hatry, and Kathryn E. Newcomer, editors, Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation
Business Law
1. Invent a product. This could be the product (can be an app) you have already submitted in your first week’s discussion or a new one. The product is one you will market for profit. Assume your product has been developed and created and is ready for distribution. Do not concern yourself whether the product can reasonably be realized. Be creative!
2. Draft a contract for the sale of the product to a retail establishment. The retailer could be a brick and mortar or online store, restaurant, hardware store, etc.
3. The contract should contain the This includes specifics on terms such as description, price, quantity, shipping or delivery, payments, etc. You may use other sources beyond your textbook. Do not use terms you do not understand. Do not just “copy and paste” a contract you find on the internet. Make this contract yours. (Google sample contracts for the sale of goods for various sample templates.)
Also you are required to add at , along with an arbitration and attorneys fees clause.
Your contract is worth 100 points; up to 50 points will be given for professionalism, which includes title of document on top and centered, formatting, alignment of paragraphs, spacing, spelling, and grammar (no unnecessary underlines and deletion of any instructions and items in parentheses); and up to 50 points on how well you incorporated all the necessary elements of a contract and followed the instructions, including adding the 7 boilerplate provisions and an arbitration and attorneys fees clause. It is 25% of your grade.
Security and Law
What are the implications of globalization on homeland security?
You must separate each aspect of the question into different paragraphs and incorporate headers to differentiate the various aspects. Failure to do so will cost you five points.
Instructions: Fully utilize the materials that have been provided to you in order to support your response. I need it to be at least 350 words and will pay accordingly.
: Considerations for plea bargaining
You are a prosecutor presenting the defense attorney a plea offer that does NOT reduce the criminal charge and offers a very small reduction in the sentence recommendation for the defendant. Discuss which of the factors listed below you gave the greatest weight when deciding to make such a get tough offer.
Factors: Employment status, drug history, age of defendant, prior felony arrests, juvenile record, probation or parole at time of arrest, detained, offense type, and amount of evidence against the defendant. You can also choose other factors not listed here, if they are more important to you.