My doctor had sent me the following instructions to employ on my research proposal. Editing and rewriting is required in the light of the two following paragraphs to be done on my research proposal. I would also like to ask if you could implement new amendments after its first delivery for me? Thank you.

“My concern with your proposed project at this stage is in regards to the research question(s) that you pose: the originality of the project and its potential to advance the discourse (which is required for a PhD). A number of commentators have already been discussing the legal potential/impact of the TPNW, and it is fairly clear that it would be very difficult to see it as having binding customary effect without the support of the nuclear powers, which is not going to happen any time soon. I think its fair to say that the discussion has already moved to questions of e.g. political impact, possible shifts in perspective towards humanitarian underpinnings in discourse and the relationship between disarmament and arms control in this context. I am, for example, currently supervising a PhD considering some of these wider aspects, which is already half completed. I do not think it is possible to base a PhD project on the legal impact of the treaty at this stage in the way that you envisage. In addition, other aspects of your project, such as the correctness of the ICJs conclusions regarding the compatibility of nuclear weapons with IHL principles such as distinction is of course important, but has been written about extensively since 1996.”

“I therefore think it is necessary for you to identify a more novel research question or approach that allows you to move some of these debates forward. You clearly have excellent knowledge in this area as I say, your background research work in this proposal is excellent and I would be interested in working with you on a topic in the nuclear law field, but my view is that you need a stronger research question for a viable PhD proposal.”

My doctor had sent me the following instructions to employ on my research proposal. Editing and rewriting is required in the light of the two following paragraphs to be done on my research proposal.

“My concern with your proposed project at this stage is in regards to the research question(s) that you pose: the originality of the project and its potential to advance the discourse (which is required for a PhD). A number of commentators have already been discussing the legal potential/impact of the TPNW, and it is fairly clear that it would be very difficult to see it as having binding customary effect without the support of the nuclear powers, which is not going to happen any time soon. I think its fair to say that the discussion has already moved to questions of e.g. political impact, possible shifts in perspective towards humanitarian underpinnings in discourse and the relationship between disarmament and arms control in this context. I am, for example, currently supervising a PhD considering some of these wider aspects, which is already half completed. I do not think it is possible to base a PhD project on the legal impact of the treaty at this stage in the way that you envisage. In addition, other aspects of your project, such as the correctness of the ICJs conclusions regarding the compatibility of nuclear weapons with IHL principles such as distinction is of course important, but has been written about extensively since 1996.”

“I therefore think it is necessary for you to identify a more novel research question or approach that allows you to move some of these debates forward. You clearly have excellent knowledge in this area as I say, your background research work in this proposal is excellent and I would be interested in working with you on a topic in the nuclear law field, but my view is that you need a stronger research question for a viable PhD proposal.”

https://www.worldcat.org/title/why-are-all-the-black-kids-sitting-together-in-the-cafeteria-and-other-conversations-about-race/oclc/1004320266&referer=brief_results

The above link is the book for the book critique.

Your responses must be in paragraph form.
1. What is the authors major thesis? Please go straight to the key points with some elaborations.
2. Do you feel that the author is effective to support her thesis? Why or why not?
3. Which theoretical perspective in sociology is best reflected in the book?
4. Are there any biases in the book?
5. Is there anything that you disagreed with? Why or why not?
6. Your comments, opinions, etc.

1. Format: Double-spaced pages in Times New Roman 12-point font with 1-inch margins. Put your name in the left top corner and
page number in the right top corner. No cover page is needed. No extra space between a title and the main text. Acceptable
formats include Microsoft Words, Mac Pages, or Google Open Word Document

3. It is highly recommended that you may incorporate some major sociological theoretical perspectives in your book critique.

Review the autopsy photos. Create a story detailing how you believe that the victim died. You are required to do research using 4 outside sources. You cannot use papers or books written by any professors from FGCU to support your position. I want to know what other researchers say about the subject. Using information from professors at FGCU will cost you 50% of the grade which is an automatic loss of ten points. 

There are four (4) aspects of the research paper:
The paper must be a minimum of 1000 words.
You cannot use a paper that has been previously submitted.
The paper is to be written in the APA format.
You must use a minimum of four (4) resources, the internet can only account for one (1) of the sources. All of the other resources must come from journals and books.

As a criminal justice professional, report writing is an important aspect of your responsibilities. For this assignment, you will review a scenario and complete a report commonly found within a particular criminal justice profession.
Review the four (4) options below and choose one option to complete this assignment. For your chosen option, review the associated scenario and complete the provided report template:
Option 1: Law Enforcement Officer
Scenario: Watch and take notes on the video scenario: CJ in Practice Video: Traffic Stop
Report Template: Assume that an arrest is made in the scenario and complete the Arrest Report.
Option 2: Adult Parole and Probation Officer
Scenario: Read the Lindsey Nahol Scenario below:
The defendant, Lindsey Nahol, entered Sparkle Jewelry and asked the sales clerk to show her several pieces of expensive jewelry.  When the clerk turned his back, the defendant slipped a diamond necklace into her purse and walked towards the exit.  When the security guard attempted to stop the defendant, she kicked and scratched the security guard.  With help from the store clerk, the security guard restrained the defendant and held her in a room until the local police arrived.  The local police officer placed her under arrest for robbery.  Ms. Nahol has been in jail for 60 days, and has plead guilty to robbery and assault and battery.  Before imposing sentencing, Judge Fairmont ask for a pre-sentence investigation or report. 
The pre-sentence investigation reveals that Ms. Nahol, now 30, has been involved in the criminal justice system since she was 14, when she was adjudicated for car theft, for which she was placed on juvenile probation.  However, she violated her probation, however, upon reinstatement of the probation, she successfully completed a 36-month probational term.  As an adult, Ms. Nahol has been sentenced three previous times, as an adult, for various crimes including shoplifting, burglary and possession of a controlled substance.  She successfully completed her probation for these offenses one year ago.  Ms. Nahol states that she stole the car when she was 14 because she wanted her friends to think that she was cool and not a nerd.  She states that this is also the reason why she started using drugs.  As for the security officer, during the interview, Ms. Nahol stated that she was defending herself and standing her ground, because the security guard grabbed her first, when he was trying to prevent her from leaving the store.
Ms. Nahol has her high school diploma; she has not spoken to any of her family members in more than a year.  But states that she is very close friends who let her crash at their house anytime she wants.  She spends her time thinking about her future and is interested in earning her degree in criminal justice from Strayer University and after obtaining her degree she wants to be a juvenile probation officer.
The prosecutor has asked for five (5) years in prison, followed by five (5) years of probation.  The defense attorney has asked for time served and two years of probation.
Report Template: Pre-Sentence Investigation Report (Adult)
Option 3: Juvenile Parole and Probation Officer
Scenario: Watch and take notes on the video scenario: CJ in Practice: Juvenile Detention
Report Template: Pre-Sentence Investigation Report (Juvenile)
Option 4: Criminal Investigator
Scenario: Read A Mutilation Murder Case on page 670 of your textbook.
Report Template: Crime Scene Investigation Report
Once you have chosen one of the options above and reviewed the scenario and required report template, complete the report template in which you:
Fill out the report with the specific information provided in the scenario.
Fill out the report in its entirety by making the necessary assumptions and/or creating the facts that are not included in the scenario.
Articulate the circumstances of the scenario in the narrative portion of the report, as appropriate.
Use concise and clear language and an appropriate tone of voice to communicate the factual information effectively.

I need to summarize this article and these are the steps
1. Cite the article, the author and journal that it came from
2. Identify the major theme, theory, research question etc.
3. What the author(s) found.
4. Why this is important for your topic and how does it apply to your weekly readings.
5. What you learned from the article.

Purpose
To gather information on the topic of your research.
To know what has already been done by other research

Search and read a research journal article with a focus on the literature reviews. Then, discuss and answer the following questions:

1.  What is the research objective?

2.  What is the research question?

3.  How does the literature review relate to the research objective and question?

4.  What are some ethical considerations that are important in this article?