Please refer to the attached files containing more detailed information and instructions.

Be sure to answer each question in it’s entirety one by one being as clear and precise as possible.
Write and label each question by number then provide detailed answer under each question.

Google the case of Palese v. Delaware State Lottery and read the actual case.  Answer the question about whether or not Palese won his case.  Discuss, in depth, why he won or why he did not win. (minimum 500 words).  The important cases in this chapter are Trapani Construction Co. v. Elliott Group and Symons v. Heaton.

Section A–Summary
Articles of Impeachment against
    President Richard M. Nixon
  –Recommended by House Judiciary Committee
______
Three Articles of Impeachment
    1) obstruction of justice
    2)  using powers of office of Pres. to violate
        oath of office
    3)  refusal to produce data pursuant to subpeona duces                            tecum
___________________________________________________________________

Section B:  Identify the role of the following in the Watergate Crisis and Saturday Night Massacre:
          (*=very important role in Watergate Crisis)
*John Erlichman
*H.R. Haldeman
*John Mitchell
*John Dean
__________________________________________________________________________

ASSIGNMENT: 
1)  Watch  VIDEO TO TIE THE NAMES IN SECTION B
TO WHETHER NIXON WOULD/NOT HAVE BEEN IMPEACHED FOR ITEMS
LISTED UNDER SECTION A

2) “GOOGLE” OR otherwise search  proposed articles of impeachment (esp. No. 2 above)
to understand how Pres. Nixon used various agents/agencies (CIA, FBI, Post Office, IRS. etc.)
to further his “enemies list” scenarios

Possible Videos:  1)  The Watergate Scandal:  Part 2 (Available YOUTUBE) 
      2)  Watergate Plus Thirty (Lloyd Sealy Library, VDVD 115)

GUIDELINES FOR VIDEO REPORT

VIDEO REPORT SHOULD  INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:
      (Limit report to no more than one half page–double space)
1)  Title of Video
2)Film-maker’s purpose for creating video
3) Methods/Facts Used to Achieve Main Purpose
4)  Facts/Methods/Sources Omitted by Film-maker
5)  Your Critique of Whether Film-maker Achieved Purpose specified in Item 1  of your report

1 consists of answering Critical Thinking Questions from CRIM 210 (Introduction to Criminology). Please answer the assigned questions in 3-6 paragraphs (4-6 sentences per paragraph) using proper A.P.A. writing techniques. Each writing assignment is scored out of 50 points. Outside . Please use Times New Roman 12 font and double space the document. The writing assignment will be graded on content, proper writing/grammar, A.P.A. format, and research. The professor will check for plagiarism, so please be conscious of plagiarism rules. Please be detailed and remember to support all claims within the document. Please refer to the Writing sample template and instructions for further information. Upload the assignment in a Microsoft Word document on Blackboard prior to the deadline.

Below is the grade rubric for each writing assignment along with a sample template:

Content (15 points): Did the student answer the questions in the proper context and provide sufficient evidence explaining their position? Additional scholarly resources supporting opinions expressed will be needed in order to maximize points. Remember each question should be 3-6 paragraphs (4-6 sentences per paragraph) in length.

Grammar/Proper Writing (15 points): Did the student follow proper grammar and writing techniques? The writing assignment involves technical writing. Avoid pronoun-antecedent agreement errors, avoid broad generalizations and journalistic rhetoric, and use formal language. Attempt to eliminate all typographical or spelling errors from the document.

A.P.A. Format (10 points): Did the student follow proper A.P.A. writing techniques including proper citations (in-text and reference)? Remember to include a proper A.P.A. cover page (see sample found in the syllabus) and a reference. When paraphrasing please use the author’s last name comma year. For example, (Smith, 2020) or Smith & Jackson, 2020) for multiple authors. If you are using a direct quote, add the page number for instance, “The class involved studying criminology” (Anderson, 2020, p.130). All students should follow the template provided and consult an A.P.A. handbook for additional information regarding A.P.A. format.

Research (10 points): Did the student support claims and arguments with solid facts from outside scholarly resources along with the textbook? Remember to limit the number of direct quotes and paraphrase outside resources in order to improve the quality of the document. Each writing assignment should have at least 3-6 scholarly or peer-reviewed references. Some helpful hints include citing scholarly material found in academic databases such as, ProQuest, JSTOR, or EBSCO. Try to avoid non-scholarly research such as, magazines, unsupported websites, newspaper articles, Wikipedia, YouTube or television articles etc. Research is essential when supporting an opinion within the document.

These are the questions that you have to answer and write about;

Q1 in your opinion, do you believe shaming in a form of deterrence, and can shaming be used as an effective form of punishment? why or why not?

Q2 can American society provide justice to victims while limiting incarceration? why or why not?

Q3 According to rational choice theorists, why do some people under certain circumstances com-it crime or delinquency?

I have  upload a sample written  paper to give an idea of what is required

Read the Kaboom case.  Brainstorm the impacts that Kaboom hopes to achieve.  Starting with those outcomes in a logic model, fill out the other elements of the logic model.  Mark elements of the logic model with L, S, R if that element is uniquely tied to either the Lead, Seed, or Rally components of Kabooms work.  Please use the attached TEMPLATE for your logic model.  I have also attached some two examples of the logic model

The permission for this book is only 7 days, so you need to finish the book and complete the book review within 7 days. You need to download the book to the Adobe Digital Editions app to see it. I’m not sure which file you can open it in these files. If you cannot open it, please connect me immediately

Joanne is a 75 year old widow who survives on her husband’s small pension. Joanne has become increasingly forgetful, and her family worries that she may have Alzheimer’s disease. No physician has diagnosed her, however, and no court has ruled on her competence.

One day while she is out shopping Joanne stops by a store that is having a sale on pianos and enters into a 15 year installment contract to buy a grand piano. When the piano arrives the next day, Joanne seems confused and repeatedly asks the delivery person why a piano is being delivered. Joanne claims that she does not recall buying a piano. Explain whether the contract is void, voidable, or valid. Can Joanne avoid her contractual obligation to buy the piano? If so, how?

As always, remember to be respectful of each other, and please provide legal reasons for your answers.

Please don’t copy any text from the Internet.