The marketing of Oxycontin was based on the simple idea that Oxycontin could reduce chronic pain without posing a risk for abuse or addiction. Purdue made this claim to every doctor, stakeholder, and audience that they could. But how accurate was this claim and the specific arguments they were making? And in repeating this claim, what pieces of information were being overlooked or dismissed by Purdue? please reference Pain Killer-Barry Meier

The marketing of Oxycontin was based on the simple idea that Oxycontin could reduce chronic pain without posing a risk for abuse or addiction. Purdue made this claim to every doctor, stakeholder, and audience that they could. But how accurate was this claim and the specific arguments they were making? And in repeating this claim, what pieces of information were being overlooked or dismissed by Purdue? Please reference pain killer by Barry Meier

Consider the following scenario:
Simon has done so well in the food truck business that he attracted the attention of numerous investors. However, Simon never really considered partnering with other vendors until he received an inquiry from the Street Foods R Us franchise.

Orlando, the owner of the Street Foods R Us franchise, was interested in the possibility of setting up business in a food truck park with Simon as a part of a franchise agreement. Orlando would be the franchisor, and Simon would be the franchisee. Orlando would supply Simon with the use of his nationally known trademarks as well has his expertise. Orlando wanted to be certain that Simon was serious, so he asked Simon to secure a land lease and $20,000 for start-up costs. The $20,000 was to be paid to Orlando.

Simon withdrew $10,000 of his savings to secure a multi-year land lease and took out a $20,000 mortgage on his home to cover the franchise start-up costs. When Orlando mentioned that they needed lighting for nighttime vending, Simon contracted with an electrician service to install commercial-grade outdoor lighting fixtures throughout the property. The electricians bill totaled $8,000.

breach of contract
Despite numerous phone calls, Simon did not hear from Orlando again until a month later, when Orlando advised Simon that the leased land was not to his liking and that the franchise start-up costs would be $45,000 instead of $20,000.

Frustrated by Orlandos demands, Simon protested and asked Orlando to reconsider the deal. Orlando refused and told Simon, Take it or leave it. To recoup his losses, Simon filed a lawsuit against Orlando based on breach of contract and undue influence. Orlando responded by asking the court to dismiss the case because no formal franchise agreement was ever signed between the parties and because he did not unduly influence Simons business decisions in the matter.
Using the Simons Food Truck (Wheelin and Dealin) Template.docx, describe the elements necessary to form a contract.
Follow APA formatting requirements, including use of 12-point Times New Roman font.
Correct use of citations and references is required.
Refer to OCLS APA Writing Styles Guides for questions.
When you have completed your assignment, save a copy for yourself and submit a copy to your instructor by the end of the workshop.

Answer the following questions in 50 to 100 words each.
A. What are the elements of negligence? When and how can a plaintiff claim damages if the defendant has breached a duty of care?
B. If a plaintiff is partially liable for his or her own injuries, what impact would the doctrines of contributory negligence and comparative negligence have on his or her case?
C. Explain the doctrine of strict liability with examples.
D. What are the two elements required to be convicted of an intent crime?
E. What is the exclusionary rule, and how does it discourage unreasonable search and seizure?
Follow APA formatting, including use of 12-point Times New Roman font. Correct use of citations and references is required.

Assignment 2.3 requires you to draft a 50-75 word answer for each of the following questions (please be sure to cite any sources used in APA):

Please provide a summary of the facts of this case. Your summary should include what the Conestoga, Hobby Lobby, and Mardel companies objected to as part of their religion. Your summary should also include how the federal government became a party to this case.
What statutory law passed by Congress was at issue in this case?
Which Constitutional law principle(s) were at issue here, and what test did the Supreme Court apply? (Rational Basis Scrutiny?)
How many contraceptives does the federal government require an employer health insurance plan to provide, and did Conestoga, Hobby Lobby, and Mardel have company policies forbidding employees from using the four contraceptives at issue? Did the companies object to providing any form of contraceptives to their employees?
What was the Supreme Courts holding in this case? What if a business owner studied scientific journals and came to the belief that a babys life begins at conception, or shortly thereafter, and then objected to the provision of the four contraceptives in this case? Would they have a Constitutional argument they could make in order to protect their conscience if they were an atheist and did not recognize any form of religion?

Assignment 1.3 requires you to draft a 50-100 word response in APA format to the following five questions.  To organize this submission, I recommend that you simply list the question and include your response directly after it.

What is law and what are some of its functions?
What is English common law, and what role does it play in the U.S. judicial system?
Explain the priority of law in the United States. For example, how do the various laws take precedence over each other?
What are long-arm statutes, and how do they allow states to exercise jurisdiction over individuals or business entities?
What are the two main types of exclusive jurisdiction granted to federal courts by the Constitution?

answer the following with  about 550 words. The class is Drugs, justice and society. 
  Describe the drug problem in America. Distinguish between drug misuse and drug abuse. Examine the prevalence rates of drug use for different groups in the United States. Compare and contrast the reasons for drug use among those different groups.

Find an example of a high-profile incident in which the actions and/or decisions of one or more individuals in the public safety field left citizens questioning the ethics of the action/decision and write a case study about that incident.

Your study should address at least the following:
Who were the stakeholders potentially impacted by the actions/decisions?
What arguments might those involved have made that their actions were ethical
Be sure to consider various ethical frameworks when considering this question–for example:
From a utilitarian perspective, he or she might have argued that…
From a deontological perspective, he or she might argue…
Considering virtue ethics, he or she might argue…
Explain why the actions made were or were not ethical.  Be sure to explain the academic definition you’re using as a baseline for this part of the discussion
How different actions by public safety administrators may have shaped the outcome of the incident or the perception of the public concerning either the ethics of the decision and/or the appropriateness of the organization’s reaction to it. For example (not all-inclusive), might better hiring standards or increased ethical training has impacted the situation–might more swift action to support or condemn the individual(s) had a positive impact on the public’s perception of the individual(s) or organization. 
The body of the Case Study shall be 8-10 pages, excluding other material such as the cover page, abstract, table of contents, graphics and tables, and references.

The Case Study Paper shall contain:

Cover Page
Abstract
Body of Paper (8-to-10 pages)
References Page
The paper shall be formatted as follows:

APA 7th edition
1 inch margins
12 point font, either New Times Roman or Arial font style
Double spaced, making sure there are no “extra” spaces in between paragraphs
Properly formatted Section headings as appropriate
In the following descending order of preference, information sources must be either peer-reviewed articles, government reports, or other sources approved by your instructor. Internet information sources from other than authoritative sources are discouraged.

Hi please let me know if you can open video link on Slide two, please confirm as you need to watch video before creating response. Also please quote price,

We will post our discussion response of our verdict, after i will have to respond to 3 students verdicts whos were opposite to ours and provide input on why it should be like ours, i cant add file it is to big