Category: Natural science

Ohio River Flood of 1937

RESEARCH PAPER

You have selected your topic and received some suggestions as to points that should be covered. These topics will also be covered in class and presented by you.

Technical Requirements:
12 point Arial font
Double spaced
1 inch margins all around
5-7 pages, not including any images or illustrations
Any number of images may be used in your paper

    The paper may be longer but points will be deducted if it is shorter

Order:
Separate Title Page with students name on it
Body of paper with images inserted in proper places. Remember that the 5-7 page count does NOT include images.
Use End notes instead of Footnotes
References (3-5) on separate page at end of paper
Use style for references that is consistent I prefer a clean, simple format

metal toxicity on brain

Literature review about the metal toxicity in brain, please include just these metal, (nickel, iron, Aluminium, zinc)
provide information about nickel toxicity on new born baby (does it make any modification for the DNA and does it affect boys and girls differently)
How do all metal get inside the brain and pass the blood brain barrier, does it bind to any Low molecular compound (what are they and how to bind them) or just bind to  transferrin in the blood.

please be specific to brain and the side effect of metal on brain provide some studies from the literature that support that and please make sure all references are from high impact paper and new
regards     

History & Philosophy of Science

Read Chapters 13 and 14 of “Worldviews.” 

1- Describe in precise detail how each of Ptolemy and Copernicus accounted for the motion of the planet Mars.

2- Explain the observational issues each of Ptolemy and Copernicus sought to account for.

3-Explain the fundamental issues that each of Ptolemy and Copernicus sought to rectify with observations, be these philosophical, religious or social. Did either Ptolemy or Copernicus arrive at a satisfactory resolution of observation, fundamental issues and description of the motion of Mars? Explain the nature of the resolution or remaining discrepancies and inherent contradictions in the final descriptions of Ptolemy and of Copernicus as you would judge them to have understood these matters.

4-Explain in detail how each of the following philosophical criteria and concepts terms that were discussed in Chapters 5 to 8 could be applied to describe the approach of Ptolemy and of Copernicus to the motion of Mars: confirmation reasoning, disconformation reasoning, deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning, Quine-Duhem thesis, falsifiability,  instrumentalism, realism.

5- Please search for at least three historical studies of each of Ptolemy and Copernicus on scholar.google.com, or elsewhere. Summarize the studies that you identify and describe in detail, as far as it can be determined, what were Ptolemy’s and Copernicus’ actual intellectual, philosophical, and religious beliefs, if any. Which of these, again, if any, were important to them in constructing their respective descriptions of the motion of Mars. Consider the possibility that mere, but necessary, lip-service could have been given to philosophy or religious dogma by investigators in order to reduce suspicions and the consequent dangers of accusations of religious heresy.

6-What do you conclude Ptolemy’s motives were and what reasoning influenced him most? Explain. Did he more likely regard his system as a true account of reality or as a convenient mathematical system for predictions not necessarily corresponding to an underlying physical reality?

History & Philosophy of Science

Please read to the end of Chapter 8 in the textbook, “Worldviews.

1- Explain in detail each of the following terms that are discussed in Chapters 5 to 8: confirmation reasoning, disconformation reasoning, deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning, Quine-Duhem thesis, falsifiability,  instrumentalism, realism.

Read the attached four articles.

2- Which, if any, of the following concepts are implicitly referred to by the authors of the four articles: confirmation reasoning, disconformation reasoning, deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning, Quine-Duhem thesis, falsifiability,  instrumentalism, Provide specific quotations and references to page and paragraph and detailed analysis of each point made in these articles that you use in your answers. Are any of the above concepts crucial to the concept of scientific truth held by each of the four article authors? What additional or alternative concepts are key to the worldviews of these four authors?

3- Do either Rovelli or de Haro make compelling cases for the importance to progress in physics of a philosophy of physics? If they succeed in doing so, how do they succeed? If they fail, why do they fail?

4- Do Einstein and/or Weinberg convincingly argue that a philosophy of physics is of no such importance.

History & Philosophy of Science

Please read to the end of Chapter 8 in the textbook, “Worldviews.

1- Explain in detail each of the following terms that are discussed in Chapters 5 to 8: confirmation reasoning, disconformation reasoning, deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning, Quine-Duhem thesis, falsifiability,  instrumentalism, realism.

Read the attached four articles.

2- Which, if any, of the following concepts are implicitly referred to by the authors of the four articles: confirmation reasoning, disconformation reasoning, deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning, Quine-Duhem thesis, falsifiability,  instrumentalism, Provide specific quotations and references to page and paragraph and detailed analysis of each point made in these articles that you use in your answers. Are any of the above concepts crucial to the concept of scientific truth held by each of the four article authors? What additional or alternative concepts are key to the worldviews of these four authors?

3- Do either Rovelli or de Haro make compelling cases for the importance to progress in physics of a philosophy of physics? If they succeed in doing so, how do they succeed? If they fail, why do they fail?

4- Do Einstein and/or Weinberg convincingly argue that a philosophy of physics is of no such importance.

History & Philosophy of Science

Please read to the end of Chapter 8 in the textbook, “Worldviews.

1- Explain in detail each of the following terms that are discussed in Chapters 5 to 8: confirmation reasoning, disconformation reasoning, deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning, Quine-Duhem thesis, falsifiability,  instrumentalism, realism.

Read the attached four articles.

2- Which, if any, of the following concepts are implicitly referred to by the authors of the four articles: confirmation reasoning, disconformation reasoning, deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning, Quine-Duhem thesis, falsifiability,  instrumentalism, Provide specific quotations and references to page and paragraph and detailed analysis of each point made in these articles that you use in your answers. Are any of the above concepts crucial to the concept of scientific truth held by each of the four article authors? What additional or alternative concepts are key to the worldviews of these four authors?

3- Do either Rovelli or de Haro make compelling cases for the importance to progress in physics of a philosophy of physics? If they succeed in doing so, how do they succeed? If they fail, why do they fail?

4- Do Einstein and/or Weinberg convincingly argue that a philosophy of physics is of no such importance.

History & Philosophy of Science

Please read to the end of Chapter 8 in the textbook, “Worldviews.

1- Explain in detail each of the following terms that are discussed in Chapters 5 to 8: confirmation reasoning, disconformation reasoning, deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning, Quine-Duhem thesis, falsifiability,  instrumentalism, realism.

Read the attached four articles.

2- Which, if any, of the following concepts are implicitly referred to by the authors of the four articles: confirmation reasoning, disconformation reasoning, deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning, Quine-Duhem thesis, falsifiability,  instrumentalism, Provide specific quotations and references to page and paragraph and detailed analysis of each point made in these articles that you use in your answers. Are any of the above concepts crucial to the concept of scientific truth held by each of the four article authors? What additional or alternative concepts are key to the worldviews of these four authors?

3- Do either Rovelli or de Haro make compelling cases for the importance to progress in physics of a philosophy of physics? If they succeed in doing so, how do they succeed? If they fail, why do they fail?

4- Do Einstein and/or Weinberg convincingly argue that a philosophy of physics is of no such importance.

History & Philosophy of Science

Please read to the end of Chapter 8 in the textbook, “Worldviews.

1- Explain in detail each of the following terms that are discussed in Chapters 5 to 8: confirmation reasoning, disconformation reasoning, deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning, Quine-Duhem thesis, falsifiability,  instrumentalism, realism.

Read the attached four articles.

2- Which, if any, of the following concepts are implicitly referred to by the authors of the four articles: confirmation reasoning, disconformation reasoning, deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning, Quine-Duhem thesis, falsifiability,  instrumentalism, Provide specific quotations and references to page and paragraph and detailed analysis of each point made in these articles that you use in your answers. Are any of the above concepts crucial to the concept of scientific truth held by each of the four article authors? What additional or alternative concepts are key to the worldviews of these four authors?

3- Do either Rovelli or de Haro make compelling cases for the importance to progress in physics of a philosophy of physics? If they succeed in doing so, how do they succeed? If they fail, why do they fail?

4- Do Einstein and/or Weinberg convincingly argue that a philosophy of physics is of no such importance.

History & Philosophy of Science

Please read to the end of Chapter 8 in the textbook, “Worldviews.

1- Explain in detail each of the following terms that are discussed in Chapters 5 to 8: confirmation reasoning, disconformation reasoning, deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning, Quine-Duhem thesis, falsifiability,  instrumentalism, realism.

Read the attached four articles.

2- Which, if any, of the following concepts are implicitly referred to by the authors of the four articles: confirmation reasoning, disconformation reasoning, deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning, Quine-Duhem thesis, falsifiability,  instrumentalism, Provide specific quotations and references to page and paragraph and detailed analysis of each point made in these articles that you use in your answers. Are any of the above concepts crucial to the concept of scientific truth held by each of the four article authors? What additional or alternative concepts are key to the worldviews of these four authors?

3- Do either Rovelli or de Haro make compelling cases for the importance to progress in physics of a philosophy of physics? If they succeed in doing so, how do they succeed? If they fail, why do they fail?

4- Do Einstein and/or Weinberg convincingly argue that a philosophy of physics is of no such importance.

Creation of Dystopian and Utopian Cities

The Creation of Dystopian and Utopian Cities

In Modules 04 and 05 you saw video clips of the fictional films Metropolis (Fritz Lang, 1923) and Blade Runner (Ridley Scott, 1992). The makers of these movies created futuristic urban landscapes that were sometimes utopian (perfect, idealistic), but mostly dystopian (unpleasant, totalitarian, environmentally degraded). It is important to note that even science fiction and fantasy says more about how we live today than how we will live in the future. As part of the additional reading for Module 05, I give you access to papers that I wrote about Sin City (Robert Rodriguez and Quintin Tarantino, 2005), A Scanner Darkly (Richard Linklater, 2006) and Dark City (Alex Proyas, 1998). The first paper on Sin City, in particular with its focus on urban dreams and nightmares, helps inform some of the urban theory you are learning about in this class. The paper on A Scanner Darkly focuses on suburbia as a dystopian landscape. The other two papers create focus on film noire urban landscapes that are also about future dystopias. With this exercise, I want you to write a short essay on one of your favorite movies that depicts a dystopian and/or utopian urban landscape.
You may need to watch the movie more than once. Pay careful attention to where the action takes place, the representation of environments through the cameras eye, and the use of settings to support the development of the plot. Take notes so that you remember specific scenes and their content. You should talk about some of these in your essay. Look out for things like striking camera angles, subtle nuances of lighting, weather or props, particular changes in the setting or action.

Now you must think critically about what you have seen. Your essay should begin by summarizing the plot (no more than 2 sentences). Then describe the utopian and/or dystopian themes that the filmmaker uses as part of the story. How were characters emotions reflected in the landscapes depicted? How does the urban environment help create suspense or amusement? Discuss the possible motivations the filmmaker had for choosing the settings shown in the movie. Support your general arguments with specific examples from the movie. What is/are the point(s) of your films urban landscape (e.g. what are the morals or politics)? How do the utopian/dystopian spaces and places help the filmmaker make his/her point?

Now, tie the landscapes you have just described back in to some of the concepts weve talked about in class. There are many things you could relate gendered landscapes, spatial decentralization, anomie, spatial density, ecology, segregation, zoning, red-lining, a compliant labor force, the consumer ideal, fear and cityscapes, deviant behavior, the iron cage, ideal types, gemeinschaft and gesselschaft, biological metaphors, contractual environments, metanarratives, edge cities, privatopias, interdictory spaces. Obviously, you cannot go through all these concepts, but choose two or three as they relate to your chosen movie.
Finally, make some conclusions about how the imagined urban landscapes of your movie relate to real world urban contexts. And, as with the other exercises in the course, please keep your work to 500 words.

Helpful Readings:
Harvey, David (1989). Time and space in the postmodern cinema in The Condition of Postmodernity, pp. 308-323. Oxford and Cambridge: Blackwell.

Follow Rubric/Grammar is key.