Category: APA (edition “APA 6”)

field experience

Im international student my major is Public Health.

I did my field experience (Internship) at Alzheimers Association in USA in TN state.

I have presentation about my field experience (Internship).
I need you write Main point, and do it in word Microsoft.

1.    Alzheimers Association services:
Look at the website of Alzheimers Association and write services for this organization as bullets.

2.    Field objectives, Action plan, and Competencies:
I need you write small paragraph (not more 4 lines) for each objective about what I gained and what I contributed experience from each objective. (for more information about those objectives I uploaded all my reports and my objectives, please read all of them)

3.    Assessment of Public Health Education:
Write as bullets in general about how Public Health courses help me to understand what I studied in public based my internship at Alzheimers Association.

4.    Summarize main points.
Write summarize as bullets for my internship.

Y ou will need to write 20 multiple-choice quiz questions that require the application of t

Y ou will need to write 20 multiple-choice quiz questions that require the application of the learning principles to answer. Each question must include a real-world scenario that illustrates one of the concepts in this course and at least 4 possible choices of which only one will be correct (and you need to indicate which one is correct). No more than 3 questions may come from the same course unit. The same concept cannot be used more than once. Each question must be original (not the same as one of the current quiz questions

these are the course concepts below

Behavior Analysis/ Assumptions
:Schedules of Reinforcement
Respondent Condition
Side effects of Aversive Control

Productive maintenance

answer the question below using the 2 attachment I hand you.

question:
3. Research an organizations TPM plan. Draw parallels between the plan presented in this chapter and any TPM / reliability information your research uncovered. Utilize your research as supporting documentation. In other words, comment on what TPM your research revealed, as well as what parts of a TPM program you feel have been overlooked or you were not able to find documentation for.

Any topic (writer’s choice)

develop a comprehensive advocacy plan which details how concerted action by a group of advocacy partners in the arts industry can and will lead to the adoption, implementation, and evaluation of a particular arts policy.

Your group will collectively decide on a policy you will advocate for. You may choose to advocate for a U.S./non-U.S policy which you have analyzed for your midterm paper, as you may be able to use part of that research for the final project.  You may also choose from a number of arts policies that we discussed in class throughout the semester.

The advocacy plan should contain the following elements:

– A brief introduction of current policy
– Identification of members of the
– advocacy coalition (https://www.youtube.com/watchv=qmephNm4fvM&t=63s)
(Watch this clip and just use the concept of a “advocacy coalition,” rather than the actual policy process framework)
– Targets of the advocacy campaign (elected officials, other decision-makers)
– Advocacy messages
– Anticipated outcomes
– Mechanisms to both mobilize advocacy partners and deliver the messages–a) e-mail campaigns, b) rallies, c) legislative visits, d) traditional and social media, and e) public meetings and/or candidate forums, etc.
– Methods of tracking support for the policy proposal (e.g., polling)
– A brief timelines for all stages of the advocacy campaign.

Reading this sample Advocacy_plan-1.pdf might help you get a better idea of what specific questions you should consider for each of the above items. (attached)

Rubric
– Written components
Paper addresses all elements required in the directions. Writing is coherent and comprehensive. It also features correct grammar and MLA formatting.

– Visual components
Paper features adequate amount of visuals that help audience understand the topic better.

– Evidence of critical thinking
Paper shows critical thinking in the advocacy plans and through citations of relevant reading and other sources.

Invention task: sentences and paragraphs

Task description
To do that, you will write about an academic field or discipline with which you are familiar–or about which you are becoming familiar. Ideally, you would choose to respond to a field or discipline that you think is interesting, engaging, useful, significant, or in some other sense valuable to you.
This is a response not only to a single text, but to a number of texts in a field or discipline. You must refer to to at least three scholarly secondary sources from this field or discipline. (You can also refer to tertiary sources to support your claims e.g. reference works, guidebooks, textbooks, as long as they are specific to the area or research or scholarship you are talking about). 
In your response you must demonstrate your reading of academic sources, cite your sources accurately, write clear sentences, and give each paragraph a logical focus as well as make connections to the response as a whole. In assessing your work, we will pay particular attention to your construction of sentences, and how you shape coherent paragraphs.

Information Technology Case Study

The role I will play is the CFO  A chief financial officer in healthcare facility.For example the CFO is typically concerned will paying for new IT systems.

The goal is to show you understand who you are as an organization? What is your mission? Where are your strengths and weaknesses? Who are the major players in formulating an IT strategy?  Present pertinent facts and observations about your organization that may ultimately be important in developing a plan for IT.  I liken this to know thyself before you would go out and buy a new car or home.  You would never make a big car or home purchase, without first considering what your needs are, what is your budget, what are your priorities in terms of other things.  Similarly, organizations that rush out and make huge IT investments without first understanding the overall organizational context, often end up in trouble later when they try implement those systems.  Next you will look at your current Information technology resources, (financial, systems, people) and make some observations about where there may be issues that impede your overall organizational effectiveness as it attempts to reach its strategic goals.  Finally, you will present convincing final recommendations to your board of what you as a management team think you should do in terms of a long term IT strategy. The specific topics to address in the presentation are are identified in the class notes.

Any topic (writer’s choice)

Once you decide on an advocacy topic with your group, submit a 1-page project proposal per group. See directions for Final Advocacy Project (Paper& Presentation). Use this template to guide your brainstorming.
develop a comprehensive advocacy plan which details how concerted action by a group of advocacy partners in the arts industry can and will lead to the adoption, implementation, and evaluation of a particular arts policy.

Your group will collectively decide on a policy you will advocate for. You may choose to advocate for a U.S./non-U.S policy which you have analyzed for your midterm paper, as you may be able to use part of that research for the final project.  You may also choose from a number of arts policies that we discussed in class throughout the semester.

Final advocacy project proposal

Once you decide on an advocacy topic with your group, submit a 1-page project proposal per group. See directions for Final Advocacy Project (Paper& Presentation). Use this template to guide your brainstorming.
develop a comprehensive advocacy plan which details how concerted action by a group of advocacy partners in the arts industry can and will lead to the adoption, implementation, and evaluation of a particular arts policy.

Your group will collectively decide on a policy you will advocate for. You may choose to advocate for a U.S./non-U.S policy which you have analyzed for your midterm paper, as you may be able to use part of that research for the final project.  You may also choose from a number of arts policies that we discussed in class throughout the semester.

Global Decision Making

Business firms operate in an environment that is increasingly global. Further, the economic environment of the times is considerably dynamic and uncertain. For this assignment, each student will be required to submit a 2,000-word paper that addresses the following: How might an understanding of the international dimensions of organizational behavior help a manager make better and more ethical decisions? How would it make someone a more effective global manager in these times? The answers to these question must not only be based on the material of this class, but also integrate some of what the student has learned in other courses in the MBA program.

Journal

We Reach the Third Stage When We
Accept the Challenge and Begin to Explicitly Develop Our Thinking

Having actively decided to take up the challenge to grow and develop as thinkers, we become “beginning” thinkers, i.e., thinkers beginning to take thinking seriously. We are in the preparatory stage of taking explicit command of thinking. We realize that we know very little about the constituents of thinking, very little about how to analyze thinking for its soundness, very little about how to upgrade and improve thinking. Yet we have begun to see the necessity of learning how to take charge of our thinking.

As “beginning” thinkers, we recognize the egocentric nature of our thinking in one or more contexts of our lives. For example, we may sometimes catch ourselves trying to dominate others to get our way, or, alternatively, acting out the role of submitting to others (for the gains that submission will bring). We may begin to notice the powerful role that conformity to group norms and values plays in our lives.

As novices, we are beginning to analyze the logic of situations and problems we face, beginning to question our purposes and goals, beginning to struggle to express clear and precise questions when addressing a problem. We are beginning to see that whenever we gather information to address problems, we need to check that information for accuracy and relevance. We are beginning to understand the difference between raw information and our interpretation of it, beginning to question our conclusions, beginning to recognize assumptions guiding our inferences. We are beginning to recognize prejudicial and biased beliefs and how they lead us to unjustifiable conclusions about people. We are beginning to notice that we often misuse words and fail to follow out implications. We are beginning to recognize that whenever we reason, we think within a point of view, and that our viewpoint is often biased toward our selfish interests. We are beginning to recognize that we often think without giving due consideration to the rights and needs of others.

Thus, as beginning thinkers, we are becoming aware of how to deal with the constituents of our thoughts (i.e. our purposes, questions, information, interpretations, etc.). We are beginning to appreciate the value of consistently applying intellectual standardsstandards such as clarity, accuracy, relevance, precision, logicalness, justifiability, breadth and depth in reasoning.

To reach this stage, our values must begin to shift. We must experience some sense of the importance of intellectual humility. For if we do not come to value knowledge of our own ignorance, we will not be motivated to gain that “knowledge.” What is more, as “beginning” thinkers we must find ourselves developing some confidence in reason. In other words, we must become persuaded that developing our skill in reasoning is crucial to solving our problems and that we are capable of developing that skill. We notice ourselves talking more to others about the importance of reason and reasoning, and noticing more the negative consequences of those who fail to value them. We find ourselves struggling to develop some intellectual perseverance. We notice ourselves being quick to give up as soon as a problem becomes difficult. We have not yet found a way to systematically and successfully develop the skills and the dispositions that we now want to develop. Even though our ability to reason well may still be greatly limited, our values are beginning to shift. We are learning to want what is rational to want. In short, the foundation is beginning to form on which we can re-build our identity and character.