This modules discussion board has one thread with several tasks/questions. To complete this weeks discussion board assignment, do the following:

Take the Leadership Style Survey which is Exhibit 10-2 in Chapter 10 of the Borkowski textbook.
Present your scores for Authoritarian Style, Participative Style, and Delegative Style
Present your self-assessment/ reflection regarding  your scores.
Were you surprised at your scores?
Do you think your score is a valid representation of your true style?
Would you, or would you not like to change your style (score); why or why not?

1. Identify an existing policy from your Policy and Procedure manual in your workplace then search the literature for credible and reliable (Cochrane, AHQA, CINAHL or PubMed) information to support and/or refute the policy.

– Give an introduction indicating the policy and procedure that you will be writing about and why you chose that particular one (information on how it is executed in the workplace) 2-3 paragraphs.

– Discuss the information that you have gathered from the literature to support and/or refute this policy and procedure (while we expect information from the literature, we want to hear your voice echoing in this paper). Please use first or third person to write this paper). Please also use examples to support your claims. 4-6 paragraphs.

– Discuss revisions that you, as the nurse, would suggest should be made to this policy and procedure and include why you think these revisions should be made or why you think that no revisions need to be made, based on the evidence in the literature. 2-3 paragraphs.

2. Please adhere to the APA guidelines:

– Please have at least seven (7) citations/references. Further, at least five (5) of the citations/ references must be research based. Please note that any online articles used must be from .gov, .edu or .org only (no Wikipedia). Please include the relevant chapter(s) of your textbook. You should also have a reference page and your references should be listed in the hanger indent format. Please be reminded that you cannot have references that are not matching with citations in your paper.

– You should have a Title page with running head that starts as page 1, this page must also have the title of the paper, your name and Florida Gateway College (nothing elsesee page 51 in your APA manual 7th edition for an example)

– Your paper should be clearly written with subheading (based on APAplease refer to your APA manual for levels of heading).

– You should have an introduction, body (several paragraphs), and a conclusion.

– Your paper should be 12 font, double spaced and no less than eight (8) and more than twelve (12) paragraphs. Has the title page and the reference page.

Select two of the questions and provide your response.

1) What was your overall reaction to the reading Of Mixed Descent III?

2) Do you feel that the father’s reaction was the type of reaction to his child’s birth that you would expect to see in our society; yes or no and why?

3) What do you feel the role of another person or health care provider is in this birth event?

Case study #4

Noninvasive Prenatal Tests (NIPT) are available for a number of genetic conditions. A woman is pregnant with her first child. The woman and her husband come from a culture where the male child is highly respected. They decide to undergo testing to determine the sex of the baby. They learn through the NIPT that the baby is a girl. The husband decides that he would like to terminate the pregnancy and try for a boy.
Issues to Consider: Autonomy, Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Justice

Instructions for Assignment 1: Annotated Bibliography on Genetic
Testing and Genomics Ethics
After viewing all tabs for this week, including the introduction, resources with link to template,
and rubric, complete Assignment 1 addressing each of the following required elements. Submit
paper in drop box. Three articles for annotated bibliography should be submitted to articles drop
box. Assignment due Sunday 2359, EST.
1. Annotated Bibliography
a. Include three (3) scholarly peer-reviewed articles with the last five (5) years.
b. Include three (3) summaries or annotations, focusing on the questions about the
case study ethical issue as instructed below.
c. Annotation should be written in your own words, not copy and pasted from
article.
d. Each annotation should be 150-175 words. Each article should be cited within
the body of the paper for element 2 Case Study and Ethics, using information
from the annotation.
e. Do not refer to the author, article, journal, or other similar info within the
bibliography, but rather summarize the points that either support your discussion
or give a different view of the case study ethics in the body of your paper.
2. Case Study and Ethics
a. Introduce case study and explain the type of genetic testing being done.
b. Discuss at least two (2) of the ethical issues that need to be considered with this
case. There are issues to consider below each case study description on the choice
poll page. This section should cite each of the three articles in the annotated
bibliography.
3. Genetic Testing
a. Discuss risks and benefits of genetic testing and how they apply to the case study.
You may include psychological, financial, medical, familial and social
considerations.
(Please see your course resources).
4. Genetic Counseling
a. Describe the roles and training for those providing genetic counseling.
b. Analyze how a genetic professional may assist in decision-making with your case
study.
5. Direct to Consumer Genetic Testing
a. Explain the risks and benefits of direct to consumer genetics tests such as
23andMe
6. Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) of 2008
a. Explain the GINA Act of 2008 and how it protects individuals seeking genetic
testing.
b. Identify one aspect of GINA that applies to your case study and give rationale.
(Please see your course resources).