Category: APA (edition “APA 7”)

The Trans Global Projects Group (TGP) Operations department Talent Management/Retention

– Re-write 1.2 Problem definition (delete current text and write new one it should be about company)

-Change research objectives and make them mirror the research question (should be equal amount so 5 questions and 5 objectives) + first question and objective should be about academic literature + Create main research objective

– 3. Theoretical foundation create literature review table at the end

– create conceptual table of theories which will visualise the theories that will be used and give small explanation

The Trans Global Projects Group (TGP) Operations department Talent Management/Retention

– Re-write 1.2 Problem definition (delete current text and write new one it should be about company)

-Change research objectives and make them mirror the research question (should be equal amount so 5 questions and 5 objectives) + first question and objective should be about academic literature + Create main research objective

– 3. Theoretical foundation create literature review table at the end

– create conceptual table of theories which will visualise the theories that will be used and give small explanation

The impact of simulation on healthcare team training

Review the 10 provided articles then write 3-4 pages to explore the impact of simulation on team training.
Categorize the findings to themes e.g. Leadership, communication, patient safety, situational awareness, mutual support, participant attitude, confidence etc…
cite information in APA 7th edition

Retention Management

LITERATURE REVIEW OVERVIEW
The purpose of this research project and writing will conform to current APA 7 format.

You will research and write a literature review on a topic relevant to the course (  Retention Management).

What is a Literature Review?
A literature review discusses published information in a particular subject area, and sometimes information in a particular subject area within a certain time period. It has an organizational pattern and combines both summary and synthesis. The summary is a recap of the important information of the source; the synthesis is a re-organization, or a reshuffling, of that information. It might give a new interpretation of old material or combine new with old interpretations. Or it might trace the intellectual progression of the field, including major debates. And depending on the situation, the literature review may evaluate the sources and advise the reader on what is the most pertinent or relevant.

How is a literature review different from an academic research paper?
While the main focus of an academic research paper is to support your own argument, the focus of a literature review is to summarize and synthesize the arguments and ideas of others.  The academic research paper also covers a range of sources, but it is usually a select number of sources because the emphasis is on the argument. Likewise, a literature review can also have an argument, but it is not as important as covering a number of sources. In short, an academic research paper and a literature review contain some of the same elements. In fact, many academic research papers will contain a literature review section. but it is the aspect of the study (the argument or the sources) that is emphasized that determines what type of document it is.

Why write literature reviews?
Literature reviews provide you with a handy guide to a particular topic. If you have limited time to conduct research, literature reviews can give you an overview or act as a stepping stone. For professionals, they are useful reports that keep them up to date with what is current in the field. For scholars, the depth and breadth of the literature review emphasizes the credibility of the writer in his or her field. Literature reviews also provide a solid background for a research paper’s investigation. Comprehensive knowledge of the literature of the field is essential to most research papers.

Introduction: Gives a quick idea of the topic of the literature review, such as the central theme or organizational pattern.
    Body: Contains your discussion of sources and is organized thematically (see below for more information on each).
    Conclusions/Recommendations: Discuss what you have drawn from reviewing literature so far. Where might the discussion proceed?
    Annotated Bibliography

What is a thematic literature review?
A thematic review would have subtopics based upon factors that relate to the theme or issue.
Sometimes, though, you might need to add additional sections that are necessary for your study, but do not fit in the organizational strategy of the body. What other sections you include in the body is up to you. Put in only what is necessary. Here are a few other sections you might want to consider:
    Current Situation: Information necessary to understand the topic or focus of the literature review.
    History: The chronological progression of the field, the literature, or an idea that is necessary to understand the literature review, if the body of the literature review is not already a chronology.
    Methods and/or Standards: The criteria you used to select the sources in your literature review or the way in which you present your information. For instance, you might explain that your review includes only peer-reviewed articles and journals.
    Questions for Further Research: What questions about the field has the review sparked? How will you further your research as a result of the review?

Important Points to Consider
APA standards and contain at least 10 pages of content (excluding the title page, abstract, and references) that utilizes at least 12 scholarly articles from peer-reviewed journals, published within the past 5 years. References may not come from websites, blogs, newspapers, books, dictionaries, conference proceedings, or magazines.

Three levels of APA 7 headings must be used throughout the paper as this is a graduate-level research paper.

Do not use the same source more than a total of 3 times within the whole document for quoting or paraphrasing.

Personal Program of Managerial Leadership Development

Formulate a personal program of managerial leadership development.
In your paper,

Designate general categories or groups of leadership theories.
These include: Traits Theories, Contingency Theories, Relational Theories, and others listed in the course text.
Select one specific category of theories from the course text.
Defend why the selected category of leadership theories is most relevant to organizational leadership.
Discuss the leadership style you will adhere to and the specific reasons for selecting this style.
Examine how your leadership skills will influence your ability to motivate followers in an organization.
Identify an area of weakness in your personal leadership.
Explain how you will develop this area of weakness into a strength.
Evaluate the factors that influence organizational culture, such as organizational structure, size, policies and procedures, staff, and office politics.
Evaluate your leadership style based on the factors you chose above.

Must include a separate title page with the following:
Title of paper
Students name
Course name and number
Instructors name
Date submitted
Must utilize academic voice

Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.

Must use at least five scholarly sources in addition to the course text.
Must document any information used from sources in APA 7 styleMust include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA 7 style

Donvia

Find at least one significant factor from each of the PMESII-PT variables for Donovia. For each factor, detail what the conditions in the operational environment are and how they affect military operations. Free of plagiarism.  DESCRIBE (what is asked), EXPLAIN, ELABORATE & PROVIDE examples. Please look over the attached.

Implications on the post-genome era

I need an essay about genomics, my idea is as following:
First going trough the archievements genomic science has made since 2000, and how sequencing became more cheaper and accesible, and also how the actual issue is interpretate the data (you can go through biostatistic and big data, things like that). [Do not extend on this, a little look into the topic is just fine]
Then i’d like to talk about how world might change soon, when sequencing became even more accesible, to the lay person level.
Finaly, it may be intersting to talk about how genomics is just a piece in the ultimate understanding of biological organisms and networks, and how other newly innovative fields (as epigenetics, transcriptomics and proteomics) could help us to finally understand the organisms.

Assessing the Head, Eyes, Ears, Nose, and Throat

In this Case Study Assignment, you consider case studies of abnormal findings from patients in a clinical setting. You determine what history should be collected from the patients, what physical exams and diagnostic tests should be conducted, and formulate a differential diagnosis with several possible conditions.

Capstone Paper, Part II: Quality Improvement Plan, Resources and Conclusion

In week 5 you will write the final section your Capstone Paper. The Assignment you will submit this week will combine the work you completed in Week 4 (Evidenced-Based Practice Plan) and will integrate the Resources and Conclusion details in approximately 3-5 paragraphs for your Capstone Paper. Be sure to include scholarly references identified in the literature review to support your EBP plan. Use appropriate and persuasive language that communicates meaning with clarity and fluency to readers, and is virtually error-free (see AWE Capstone Checklist).
Write a 4-page paper that addresses the following:

Introduction. Briefly review your practice problem and include a purpose statement.

Evidence-Based Practice Plan Explanation  (Completed in Week 4)
Provide a detailed explanation of the evidence-based practice performance improvement plan that you will be use to address the practice problem.
Support your plan with scholarly references (the sources you found in the analysis of the evidence).
Resources (completed in Week 5)
Describe the resources needed to support the change in practice such as personnel time, supplies for staff education, cost of new equipment, or cost of software.
Explain why each resource is necessary.
Conclusion
Discuss all key points addressed in this assignment.

To prepare for this Assignment:

Review the Capstone Paper Assignment Guide
Locate the most current version of your Week 4 Assignment. You will add these sections to that document.
Review the Academic Writing Expectations Checklist Capstone Level
Note the new expectations for Use of evidence and Credit to Source
Use a Scholarly Voice
http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/scholarlyvoice
http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/webinars/scholarlywriting#s-lg-box-2773859
Review the Walden University Writing Center webpage: Using Evidence: Synthesis
Review the Week 5 Assignment Rubric
Review Chapter 5 in your Spath text for examples of practice improvement plans.
Spath, P. (2018). Introduction to healthcare quality management (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: Health Administration Press.
Refer to Writing Center guidelines for how to write a summary.

Life Span Psychology

The Research Paper Topic Proposal Assignment

Include the following in your topic proposal:

Your research question
Your thesis statement
A narrative describing your topic and why you chose it (its significance)
Your topic proposal should be 2 pages in length. Use current APA Style and cite and reference all sources.