Category: Chicago / Turabian

Short Essay

Frederick Jackson Turner does not specifically mention the Mormon Church or the Reynolds case in his famous essay on the role of the frontier in American history. In a short essay of 300 to 450 words, place the Reynolds decision and Professor Taysoms analysis of it in the overall context of Turners thesis. In other words, can the Mormon era in territorial Utah fit into Turners thesis of how the frontier operated in the furtherance of American liberty and individuality?

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the Turabian Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

Spiritual Disciplines

Journal Reflections: Spiritual Disciplines Assignment

1.    Leaders in History:

Identify a leader in history that you would like to know more about. This could be a business leader, political leader, religious leader, military leader, or someone from another vein of leadership. After identifying this leader review some biographies and resources on their life and explain what you think makes them a leader worth following. (Note: if you are in a chaplaincy program, focus on identifying and reviewing the life and leadership of a chaplain with a ministry similar to your own.)

2.    Theology of Leadership:

How did the theology of Luther, Calvin, Edwards, and Bonhoeffer influence and impact their leadership? Be specific about what aspects of their theology encouraged them to lead. How does theology provide the foundation for biblical leadership?

3.    Theological Assessment:

What aspects of your understanding (or practice) of theology are weakest, and what can you do about it in the next twelve months?

TEXTBOOK

Bonhoeffer on the Christian Life : From the Cross, for the World
***Chapters 4-9
https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy.liberty.edu/lib/liberty/detail.action?docID=1224605

art apperication

Use link: https://artsandculture.google.com/asset/winter-landscape-edward-willis-redfield/RgETZVRkn65Qcw?hl=en

Identification: Select a work of art. You may select a piece that you like or dislike. Get all the information provided: artist, title, medium, year, etc. Write down your initial responses. How do you respond to the work? Does it invoke an emotional response? What do you think the artist was trying to communicate? It is helpful to bring a notebook to record your responses.
Describe the piece and review it carefully. What do you see? Note all the details about the work. How would you describe it to someone you were talking to on the phone who cant see it?
Analyze the visual elements and design principles, thinking about the relationship between form, content, and subject matter. This will be helpful in your ‘interpretation’ of the work. Consider context: does it fit into a movement or time period? Consider its place in the artists overall output.
Interpretation Follow your analysis with a subjective interpretation of the meaning of the work. How does the work make you feel? What do you think the content is? Go beyond I like it or I dont like it.
Research the artist. Historical and biographical information on the artist often provides clues into a work’s intended meaning. Carefully consider the purpose and context of the piece. Did the piece you selected have any particular political or cultural message? Was the artist making a statement?
Evaluate What do you think the artist’s intentions were? Was this communicated? Does it have value? Can you recognize the aesthetic quality in the work?
Format Requirements
The paper must be 1500 words, double-spaced, 10- or 12-point type, with 1 margins. The title page, images, and reference/bibliography page do not count toward the required length of paper. The preferred format to complete the Final Paper is Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx). If these formats are not available, other acceptable formats are ASCII (.txt), rich text format (.rtf), and Open Office (.odt), and PDF. Make sure you proofread your papers for incorrect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and other errors.
A minimum of four sources is required. Research can come from the Internet (reputable, academic sources only) scholarly articles (JSTOR, for example), books on art history, politics, etc.. Sources should be varied and academic and/or professional in nature. Your textbook cannot be one of the four minimum sources but can be included.
Anything that is not considered common knowledge (information that can be found in at least 4 sources) should be cited. This includes opinions, judgments, little-known facts, and direct quotes. In-text citations (APA) or footnotes and endnotes (CMS) are used to give credit to sources of any material or scholarship borrowed, summarized, or paraphrased. They are intended to refer readers to the exact pages of the works listed in the Reference or Bibliography section.

Reflection 3

Use the attached files as your references to complete reflection 3

In this final reflection, you will write a 360-degree examination of what you learned and where you go from here. To accomplish this examination, you will look inward, outward, forward, and backward. The goal of this final reflection is for you to think about how to make sense of your learning within this course and how to successfully transfer it forward–in other words, how to determine the usefulness of this course. Please begin by thinking about how you might respond to these questions:

Look backward: How did your previous knowledge/experiences/learnings help or hinder your ability to learn and grow in this course? These experiences should be both professional experiences and academic experiences.
Look inward: Why types of risks/challenges/successes have you taken within this course? How have these risks/challenges/successes impacted you as a learner, a writer, and an employer?
Look forward: Where you have you already used the knowledge/experiences/learnings from this course? How might they inform future knowledge/experiences/learnings?
Look outward: (Revisiting the opening reflection and the revision of the opening reflection) What was your goal with getting a master’s degree, and what do you hope that it does for your future? What has it already done for you?
After thinking through these questions, please imagine a job you want in the future, whether it’s a completely different job, a promotion, or a volunteer position. Start this reflection by laying out what that specific job is, why you want that job, and then why you are capable of getting that job (or why you should be hired for the position). In order to respond to this scenario, you will need to be able to respond to and understand the questions above because they guide you towards thinking about your goals (revisiting them again), examining what you have learned and how you know you have learned it, questioning who you are as a learner, a writer, and an employer, and bringing together all of the learning and knowledge from your masters degree.

Length: 3 pages

Audience: Yourself and your instructor

I have a paper I need to write a review about

I need to analyze the attached document.

A review is a common genre across many contexts. We use them in everyday life for things like deciding what car to buy or what movie to see. Reviews are also evident in academic, civic, and profession-specific contexts. To cite a few examples, in academic disciplines literature reviews locate the authors research in relation to previous studies. Academics also write and read reviews of new publications relevant to their field of study. Business owners rely on reviews when making decisions about purchasing new equipment or technology, such as hardware or software. Members of communities use reviews to evaluate events and programs. There are many more possible uses and examples. Assignment Instructions
1.Write a 1,150 to 1,500 word review relevant to your chosen field. Draw on readings in the textbook and your investigations this semester to choose an appropriate artifact to review.2.Establishing appropriate criteria for evaluation is key to successful reviews. Your choice of criteria should emerge from an understanding of your specific audience and purpose. For example, if cost is an important factor to a managers decision-making in a business context, then it should be one of your criteria. In some genres and contexts, criteria are explicit while in other, they may be implicit. Your review should demonstrate your understanding and knowledge of how arguments are presented in your chosen field.3.Your review must be written for the same field that you chose for your genre analysis.4.Sources should be cited and the document should be formatted as appropriate to for your specific audience.

Cyber Warfare: Comm on the Internet and hazzards

Essay Question: We are a highly technical society. Our everyday lives revolve around the Internet: we benefit from the Internet, but we can also be victims of cyber criminals. To understand how criminals use the Internet to their advantage, one must understand how we communicate on the Internet. In this paper, you are required to describe in detail how we communicate on the Internet, based upon your readings. Discuss the major networking building blocks and their functions. Secondly, discuss software applications’ vulnerabilities, such as those found in web browsers.

General Requirements

1. Document Format.

a. MS Word document

b. One-inch (1″) margins

c. Times New Roman font

d. Twelve (12) pitch

e. Not including your title page, this assignment should be 4-6 pages.

f. Double space, except for your bibliography’s citations.

g. You must use 5 scholarly sources in supporting this assignment.

2. Citation Format: The Chicago Manual of Style. As stated in the Academic Integrity Briefings, information taken directly from another source must be placed in quotations and cited following the Chicago format contained in the week one “lessons” folder. You must cite all other information from your sources, even if you do not quote directly. DIRECT QUOTING SHOULD BE KEPT TO A MINIMUM.

5 pages/NO Title page

Single USE Plastic Pollution in Malaysia

The Case Study is a 5 to 7-page analysis of the specific topic. Established footnoting and citation rules must be observed.  2 different Journal article citations are required. Include a bibliography. No more than 20% of the Case Study should be quotes.  analyze and comment on the topic and sources utilized thus forming good scholarship habits. *The described format MUST be followed thus include these headings in the Case Study. Case Studies that do not include the following format will lose 10 marks.
*1.  Introduction    2. Topic Summary    3. Major Issues    4. Pro and Con Issues                    5. Personal Observation without any quotes just your own views and recommendations      6. Conclusion

architecture and slow design

You need to find an architecture designer/professional in Kansas!!!! to make an interview. The questions are listed below. Before you contact the architecture designer/professional, you need to tell me first. I will make sure the person is proper or not for this interview.
you need to record the audio for the whole interview and send it to me in an mp4 format. And organizing the five questions’ answers in a Word document. (at least 530 words, no more than 600 words) because I will use the answers in my research paper.
You need to learn some basic knowledge about slow design and architecture before the interview.

1. The application of slow design in architecture.

2. Find out how slow design in Kansas City buildings establishes a long-term emotional connection with users.

3. What design methods in architecture can convey the correct consumption view and respond to sustainable development.

4. Why did Kansas people focus on the slow design process and get physical and mental relaxation and enjoyment from architecture.

5. The development trend of slow architecture in the future.

6. Why Kansas city is a good place to develop a slow design in architecture?

Art as resistance

As it is written in the guidelines I need an artwork.  Artwork should be new (i.e. created for the first time but we can take an idea from other artists who used art as resistance on the topic we choose to create our art). Art piece could be a series of photos, collage, painting, a piece of music, story, etc. of the issue. So the artwork should be sent to me through pictures of the artwork

China’s ordinary lives in the 12th-14th centuries

Using the selections we read in Jacques Gernets Daily Life in China on the Eve of the Mongol
Invasion, combined with at least one other primary source from Weeks 10-12, analyze the
extent to which the apparatus of the state reached into ordinary peoples lives in the 12th-14th
centuries. In what ways did the state exert influence over daily life? Were there parts of
urban or rural life with which the state was definitely involved, or, conversely, parts of life
which the state could not penetrate? What other institutions, organizations, or practices
helped regulate peoples lives? Did these other institutions work to extend state power, or
come into conflict with it (or both)? If you observe any notable differences in the nature and
extent of state penetration over time (from the Song and Yuan period to the Ming period) or
space (e.g. urban and rural, north and south), why might that be?