Describe the whole event of Pearl Harbor ( event before the attack, the attack, the events immediately following the attack, and the end of the event of pearl harbor). need to explain it significant, as well as problem of interpretation associated with the world war ii. the paper must include 5 sources consisting of scholarly articles, and or recent academic books, The source are from my study book (The Lyons and Major problems in world war ii books) and scholar document and essay. the paper should begin with a descriptive title, as well as, an introductory paragraph( include the thesis and the points u will discuss in support of the thesis). Essays should be structured chronologically or thematically. Be sure to include what, when , where and it significant.
Format: Chicago style, and need at lease one footnote per supporting paragraph.
for the source, if you cant find my study book online i will scan and give it to you.
wikipedia and .com and .org are not allow as the source.
Category: Chicago / Turabian
Pearl Harbor
Any news related topic that deals with the past. Such as covid and ebola and how it was dealt with during the black plague.
write a research paper on news today that people in the past had to deal with. this is for history 1301 if you have any idea about it. Pre-columbian to civil war type of era. Also include footnote and endnotes, and work cited and bibliographys at the end.
consequences of the Black Death on the Afro-Eurasian world.
Analyze the long-term consequences of the Black Death on the Afro-Eurasian world. Specifically discuss the social, political, and economic ramifications for Western Europe, China, and the Islamic Empire. What parallels can we reasonably draw between the Black Death and today’s global pandemic?
Please use 3 citations
https://mappinghistory.uoregon.edu/english/index.html
Any topic (writer’s choice)
The French gastronome Jean Anthelme Brillat-Savarin (1755-1826) once wrote: Tell me what you eat, and I will tell you what you are. This statement was of course made in a different time, and of course the world looks very different today than it had for Brillat-Savarin.
Using the content of at least three (3) course readings from weeks 410, and covering at least two of the three regions of East Asia, discuss whether or not you believe this claim can be applicable to the foodways of East Asia, and why. Explain your reasoning using concrete examples, and take into account the historical changes in East Asian foodways in the past.
Suggestions for thinking about this essay:
What is the underlying logic of this claim? What are its underlying assumptions and limitations?
Today, what potentially still connects what you eat to what you are?
What are some complications/problems that come from connecting what you eat with what you are?
How have cuisines and identities shaped each other in the context of East Asia?
Suggestions for writing this essay:
Begin with a short introductory paragraph with a clear thesis statement that describes your position. Also mention which (two or three) regions of East Asia you will discuss, and the readings you will use to support your argument.
Cite our course readings in parenthetical style, by including author last name, page number, and which week it was assigned. For example: (Rath, 121, week 3) If you need to cite outside sources (this is optional), use Chicago citation format.
To make your case more persuasive, it is sometimes useful to consider the opposing sides arguments. What evidence might your opponents use to disagree with you?
You can use discussions from your conversation report to add support to your argument.
Your essay will be evaluated on:
Your ability to articulate a position/argument relative to this statement, with critical and analytical thinking (25%)
How well you have understood the content of our reading and used them as evidence for your position/argument (50%)
clarity and organization (25%)
Asia
Use footnotes. It is to be an argument (persuasive essay) with a strong thesis that is then proven by the argument of the paper. Research papers are to have a minimum of FIVE (5) acceptable academic sources. The word count of the assignment does not include the bibliography and any charts/maps/illustrations. It is in your best interests to discuss with the instructor possible topics, a minimum of 5 (FIVE) acceptable external research sources, thesis construction, paper mechanics and so on. Introductory textbooks (A Brief History of Buddhism, or Buddhism for Dummies) would not be acceptable. They are textbooks, not research materials.
Reaction paper
GUIDELINES:
1. A reflection paper is your identification of the main themes of the readings
integrated with your classroom experience and how both affect your
thinking and practice.
2. A reflection paper is your chance to add your thoughts and analysis to what
you have read and experienced. It is meant to illustrate your understanding
of the material and how it affects your ideas.
3. Unlike research papers, reflection papers are written in a less formal
style, with the author’s ideas and perspective being the focus of the essay.
To substantiate these ideas, you must also incorporate supporting evidence
from the article you have chosen and/or outside sources into your
reflection paper.
5. Using the first person singular (I), relate the readings and classes to your
previous knowledge and experience and consider if and how what you have
read and learned changes your thinking on the particular topic. How so?
6. In your first two paragraphs, you must identify the readings that you will
be reflecting on (state name of authors and title of readings). Briefly discuss
the subject of the articles and talk about your preconceptions of the subject,
as well as a brief summary of your initial reaction.
7.In the body of the essay, you can discuss the articles one at a time. You can
discuss the first article and then in your discussion of the second, make
connections or engage with the first article. Or, you can choose to discuss 2
to 3 main points that are made in both articles that are similar or maybe
they are different arguments. What do you agree/disagree with? You can
make links with your own personal lives, events in your communities,
events in the news etc. You can also draw on a class film/documentary.
Remember, a good compare/contrast essay doesn’t only point out how
the subjects are similar or different (or even both!).It uses those points
to make a meaningful argument about the subjects.
8. As you conclude your essay, discuss what you learned from the readings?
What questions did the readings raise? What are the implications of what
you have read?
Readings
Reaction Paper will focus on the following assigned readings and film. Select a minimum 2
1. Manning Marable, Let No Body Turn Us Around African American Anthology:
Ida B. Wells-Barnett, Crusader for Justice Section 2Chapter 13William Edward Burghardt Du Bois 195 Section 2 Chapter 14 Excerpts from The Conservation of Races Excerpts from The Souls of Black Folk The Niagara Movement, 1905 Section 2Chapter 15 Booker T. Washington and the Politics of Accommodation Atlanta Exposition Address My View of Segregation Laws Section 2 Chapter 10
2. Manning Marable, Let No Body Turn Us Around African American Anthology ,-
Edward Wilmot Blyden and the African Diaspora, Section 2 Chapter 5 The National Association of Colored Women: Mary Church Terrell and Josephine St. Pierre Ruffin Section 2 Chapter 8. Marcus Garvey and the Universal Negro Improvement Association Section 3 Chapter 4 Declaration of Rights of the Negro Peoples of the World An Appeal to the Conscience of the Black Race to See Itself Women as Leaders, Amy Euphemia Jacques Garvey, 1925 Section 3 Chapter 5
3. Film: Slavery by Another Name
Hakim Adi, Pan Africanism: A History, Chapter 2.
why, despite its limited charge and the many other atrocious acts committed during the war, was Nanking made the emblematic event of the Pacific War?
I’m looking for help with my research proposal– mainly explaining the significance of a question (which I included, but am open to changing if it remains in the general area of Nanking China) and what the goals and objectives are, as well as some background on the topic. I’ve included a rough outline, and if possible, please stick to the ratio of page limits for each section.
Spirit-Led Preaching
Student will submit a 4-page annotated book report on the book listed below. You will write your book report on the preachers method and your critique of the preachers method. Also, to Identify and from the reading what made you stumble or caused a moment of aha. Describe why the particular sentence stuck out or caused a response in you. (Include the page number where the sentence is found)
Spirit-Led Preaching by Greg Heisler
All papers must be written in the current Turabian 9th edition. Double spaced, 12 pt font, with 1-inch margins on all sides. Ensure proper documentation of footnotes and bibliography is documented correctly along with the below reading references.
Historical Analysis on Black Chicago
One of the crucial arguments William Julius Wilson made about the emergence of concentrated poverty among African Americans was that it derived, in large part, from the spatial and social separation of poor African American not only from mainstream society, but other African Americans.
Using three readings from weeks 4-8, assess to what degree you find this conclusion to be true after 1970. How much of a departure was this condition – if true – from the circumstances of the 1940s? If true, what role did key institutions and structures play in establishing that separation?
See rest of the Prompt in attached doc “Paper 2 Prompt”
See the readings you can choose from with the other attachments.
International Relations
The Final Paper assesses the final two Course objectives.
Write an Op-ed article for a newspaper, on a topic that is relevant to this class. It must address a specific policy issue that is not working, and it must present solutions on how to improve it. You may research outside resources for policy suggestions, but be sure to also incorporate this course’s texts. This is a comprehensive final to assess your understanding of this course’s objectives.
Grading will be based on the quality of the writing, the clarity of the argument, and how well it is supported by the literature from the course. See the attachment for tips on writing an effective op-ed.
The required length is 4 double-spaced pages. Remember to cite sources in the text with Turabian in-text citations and write a Reference List at the end of your work.
Upload the attachment, labeled yourlastnameFinal.doc or yourlastnameFinal.docx in the Assignment window under the Final Assignment Folder.
This assignment originally appeared at John F. Kennedy’s School of Government at Harvard University.