Category: Chicago / Turabian

one object that illustrate art trade between two different cultures.

The mid-term essay consists on a brief essay with images (1/2 pages) focusing on one object that illustrate art trade between two different cultures. The essay should be written as if you were an art dealer promoting the object in your website.(no carpet and ceramic )

Bible 364 Forum: Forum 4 (Module 6)

Topic: Paul

1.Did Paul die when he was stoned in Lystra? What is the evidence for each position, yes and no? Pauls testimony in 2 Corinthians 12 is often associated with this event. Is that valid? What are the reasons why it should or should not be associated with his stoning? Use the Bible, Ger, and one additional scholarly source to research this and to present your position.

2.Fresh on the heels of the Jerusalem Council, Paul insists on circumcising Timothy. Why would he consider this necessary? Was Paul being hypocritical, since the Council had just determined Gentiles need not be circumcised for salvation? Use the Bible, Ger, and one additional scholarly source to research this and to present your position.

THREAD

Your thread must answer the two questions in at least 300 words (150 words per question). This guideline promotes writing that is thorough, yet concise enough to permit your classmates to read all the threads. You must include references to the Bible, the textbook, and at least 1 additional outside source to support your positions. References must be formatted in the current Turabian style. First-person perspective (e.g., I or we) is allowed in all your posts.

The Post First feature has been activated in the Discussion Board Forums for this course. You will need to post your thread before you will be able to view and reply to other students’ threads.

Threads are due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Friday of Modules/Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 6.

What else does Fausto-Sterling teach us

Let’s examine “The Making of a Tejano Community” by Jesus de la Teja found in this week’s module.  For your initial post, summarize this secondary source (written by a historian) by reflecting on the following questions:

What is the author’s purpose?
What is the author’s main conclusion?
What was the key evidence used by the author to support his conclusion?  Be specific with the evidence.
What are some of the overall implications to our understanding of early frontier San Antonio, or early Tejano communities?

classical theory/model of the Communication Research to a contemporary medium/technology/practice

Apply one of the classical theory/model of the Communication Research to a contemporary medium/technology/practice. – Berlo’s model

The paper should be about 4-5 pages in length. – 2200Words

Single space and Chicago citation style.

The general structure of the paper should be:

1. Introduction

2. Describe the fundamental structure of the “classical” media theory

3. Apply apply the “classical” media theory to the new digital ecosystem

4. Conclusions

5. References (at least five, including internal and in case external resources)

African American History

Trace the arrival of    Africans    in    European    colonies    in    the 17th and    18th
century    and    the    rapid    increase    of    slave    importation    in    the    18th century.   

Digital Regulation

1.      Undertake the following steps:

        Choose a (digital) technology that interests you

o  To assist you, please see the non-exhaustive list provided below

        Identify any issues/challenges/risks/threats to society that your chosen technology poses;

        Identify the ways this digital technology is presently regulated

o  To undertake this part of the exercise, you must apply Lessigs four modalities, but can also rely on additional theories of regulation like Murrays theory of network communitarianism and Laidlaws gatekeeper theory, etc.

        Make a determination whether the regulatory framework for your chosen digital technology is efficient, sufficient, and working.

        If you think the law is too strict, make recommendations for how you would change the present regulatory strategy to enable the digital technology.

        If you conclude that your digital technology is under-regulated, present recommendations as how to constrain your technology through the further development of a further regulatory strategy.

        If you conclude that the present regulation is sufficient, undertake an exercise to identify any potential risks to the digital technology.

        Make a concluding statement as to why/how your regulatory framework will work better than the present.

Examples of digital technologies:

        Intelligent agents (Alexa, Siri), Recommender technology

        Delivery Drones, Personal Robots, Self-driving cars, Smart homes, Smart cities

        Virtual reality/Augmented Reality Wearables

        Algorithms and Machine-Learning Systems

        Facial Recognition Technology

        One class of items from the Internet of Things such as fitness wearables (like FitBit) or smart homes, smart toys, etc.)

3. Inform the course coordinator (m.r.leiser@law.leidenuniv.nl) who will need to approve the topic. Each will be approved on a first-come-first-served basis. If it is too similar to another students, I will advise you and you will need to choose a different one. When the topic is approved you can move on to the next step.

4. Thoroughly research the topic by looking for and reading information (articles, books, case law, laws, online information, news media). Make a plan for the paper (what goes in, what not; design a structure). You are strongly advised to follow the guidance in Step 1 above.

5. Write your paper. An academic paper is never perfect immediately (unless you are brilliant, but most of us unfortunately are not), so keep editing, deleting, rewriting, etc. Keep discussing the text within the group in order to fine-tune it until you think it cannot be improved. Ask a (near) native speaker to edit your text if you are uncertain about your written English. It does not need to be perfect, but it should be well enough (no big mistakes, clear sentences, logical reasoning) and readers should not have to think twice about what it is you are saying. Do not forget your references! The paper consists of maximum 2500 words, not including references. Students do not have to submit a bibliography if footnote properly.

Book review

Provide a one paragraph (5 to 7 sentences) summary of the book you read for this week’s review AND a one paragraph (5 to 7 sentences) critique of the book. End your post with a complete bibliographic citation in Turabian.

NAME OF THE BOOK

Oral historiography
by Henige, David P.
Call Number D16.14 .H46 1982
Publication Date 1982
Format: Books

Book review

Please include the following in your review:

No title page; instead use a full bibliographic citation (in Turabian form) as your title
A summary of the information in the book, including a restatement of the authors thesis in your own words
A statement about how the work is organized
A discussion of sources (primary v. secondary, what types of sources) used and their effectiveness in proving the author’s thesis
An evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of the author and his/her work
An explanation of how this work ties into information learned in this class
Correct Turabian usage throughout the paper
Watch out for passive voice!!

NAME OF THE BOOK

Oral historiography
by Henige, David P.
Call Number D16.14 .H46 1982
Publication Date 1982
Format: Books

Reflection Essay

During these unprecedented times we have all been faced with challenges and hardships that at times have seemed overwhelming. Everyones experiences, albeit perhaps very different, are all valid responses to the pandemic. For this assignment you are asked to reflect on your experiences in whatever way you feel comfortable. Throughout the class we will be reading about Chican@ and Native American History and the experiences of persons who have endured, survived and told their stories of resilience.

This assignment can take the form of a brief narrative (1-2p) or a creative piece such as a poem. There is NO limit on what you can write. Some examples of what you may reflect on are:

NOTE: (these prompts are not exhaustive, so feel free to write about anything beyond what is mentioned below)

what have you learned about yourself and others as you had/have to navigate the uncertainties that COVID-19 brings
how has your social identity (however you may identify) and that of others shaped your understanding and experience of COVID-19
as UTSA continues its path in a distance learning environment are there improvements you might suggest (note: this course has been taught asynchronously online for over five years); but you can still reflect on the way that UTSA has provided or not the needed in-person now virtual services of the university for students
given the uncertainty of COVID-19 for the next academic year how are you thinking or contemplating your future college experience
has this ongoing experience changed the way you have come to understand your responsibility to others and your relationship with friends, family, and the general population
more generally, you can simply tell your story, that is, how has COVID-19 affected you, how you are coping with it, what have you learned from it thus far, and how do you expect to move forward as we all grapple with the uncertainties that we are all facing

Discussion Board Forum 3

TEXTBOOKS TO BE READ FOR THE PAPER

1. Stanley, Andy. Deep & Wide: Creating Churches Unchurched People Love to Attend. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2016. ISBN: 978-0310494843. ( Pay specific to Chapter 11, and the conclusion )

2. Wilson, Jared. The Prodigal Church: A Gentle Manifesto against the Status Quo. Wheaton: Crossway, 2015. ISBN: 978-1433544613 . (Pay specific attention to Chapter 8, and the conclusion of it )

DISCUSSIONS ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS

Discussions are collaborative learning experiences. Therefore, you are required to create an initial thread in response to the provided prompt for each forum. Each thread must be at least 400 words and demonstrate course-related knowledge and biblical principles and/or Scripture.
Headings must be provided for each section, and any references must be in current Turabian format.

DISCUSSION BOARD QUESTIONS FOR THE PAPER

Answer the following prompts using complete sentences.

1. What aspects of the book Deep & Wide and The Prodigal Church have stood out the most to you thus far in your reading? (Be sure to cite a specific example from each book.)

2. How are the books similar in their approach? (Address the theological and philosophical approaches, not grammar or writing styles.)

3. How are the books dissimilar in their approach?

NOTE:

1. Apply to do this particular paper only if you have access to the two textbooks of Stanley and Wilson above pls. Both most be quoted.

2. Quote at least 3 different relevant scriptures to add value to your paper