Category: Chicago / Turabian

entertainmentartarchitecture

“this writing you will do to produce an argument that reaches across your earlier work. This should be entirely new writing. You may refer to a few of your responses specifically to connect this argument, but do not simply repeat what you have already said. You should demonstrate some thinking and reflection. Consider what themes your responses have in common or how some differ from others. You can set your earlier arguments and those of the authors’ against each other to produce a stronger synthesis. Again, this is not a summary, do not try to summarize all your responses or the class material. Use your responses and the class material as examples or evidence to develop your argument in writing. “

requirement: 500-700 words
(Any words taken directly from the text must be in quotations and cited with the author’s last name and page number, and any paraphrasing of the text should also be cited though not in quotations. Anything not cited must be in your own words and not copied from any other source.)

Film Analysis

–    Consult reviews (such as those at http://koreanfilm.org/) to decide on a
film you’d like to watch;
–    Check out the Korean Film Archive channel (https://www.youtube.com/user/KoreanFilm)
–    View one of the extra films streaming via the course website;
–    Use other streaming services to view a film.

Analyze the film in 750-1000 words, taking a point of view and defending it through analysis of elements of content, style, and/or meaning.  The review should include:

–    Facts (film title, director, year, etc.);
–    Character and plot summary: these are necessary (as Corrigan writes, “a review aims at the broadest possible audiencewith no special knowledge of film” [7]), but in our case should be the shortest portion of the review, giving the reader only what is necessary to understand the subsequent analysis.  Reviews that consist primarily of plot summary will be graded down;
–    Important moment or idea in the film: one way to focus your thinking is to select a key moment, idea, scene, quotation, symbol, etc. from the film and center your analysis on this;
–    Analysis and evaluation: the bulk of the review lies here.  Take a point of view on the film, discuss elements of content and/or form that support your position, and conclude with a critique of the film (whether positive, negative, or ambivalent).  As Corrigan tells us, “[w]hen you write about film, personal opinion and taste will necessarily become part of your argument.”  No reader, however, “will be satisfied with a writer who uses his [or her] personal opinions to avoid or disguise a solid critical position” (13).

Key Issues of Cyber Policy

The final assignment is a “take home” essay requirement to test knowledge and assimilation of the course learning objectives. The exclusive use of required texts and readings, as well as resources provided in the course is mandatory, although references to your personal experiences are allowed, if properly annotated and relevant. No outside sources are expected. The assignment should be at least 8-10 pages.

Complete the following:

A recent cyber attack occurred where a botnet type attack targeted a major US defense firm.  No physical damage occurred to the firms network, but significant technological secrets about a new surveillance and targeting system from the firm, Defense Applications International (DAI), appear to have been compromised. Incidental, but nonetheless as a result of the attack, the virus also infected a software program that DAI was testing at electrical plant in Pennsylvania. The plant had to be shut down for 12 hours while repairs were made. The NSA believes it has credible evidence that the attack had a direct connection to the elite cyber unit Department 2112, of the country of Redistan, an adversary of the United States, although the attack itself appears to include private citizens of Redistan. The attack however, was routed through several third countries including Bluelandia, an ally of the United States.

You are a new cyber desk officer working for the National Security Council. The Deputy National Security Advisor has asked you to write an eight page memorandum addressing key issues of cyber policy. In the memorandum you have been asked to address the following issues:

1) Based off of the facts we know, should the attack be considered a crime, espionage or act of war? What should the US response be? How can the US best defend itself from future attacks such as the one that just occurred?

2) Should the United States assign US Cyber Command with the responsibility of protecting certain private companies and if so, what should the general standard be for determining what companies the government should be responsible for defending?

3) Should the United States lead the effort at an international cyber agreement? Why or why not? What challenges would the President face in trying to get an agreement? Are there any alternatives?

4) Are there any substantive changes that should be made to the current US cyber policy?

Note: In crafting your memorandum you may allocate the content according to the importance of the issue. For example, you can allocate several pages to one issue if you believe it deserves more attention than the others; however, ensure that each question specified by the Deputy National Security Advisor is addressed. If you have read and understood the course material this will be a challenging, yet straight forward assignment.

Technical Requirements:

Length: 8-10 pages double spaced, 1″ margins, 12 pitch type in Times New Roman font left justified format.

Citations/References:  You must use Turabian parenthetical style for this assignment.

Must utilize any of the below following references to write the essay. If unable to access then omit.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/omb/memoranda/2016/m-16-04.pdf

https://archive.defense.gov/home/features/2015/0415_cyber-strategy/final_2015_dod_cyber_strategy_for_web.pdf

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905.pdf

https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy1.apus.edu/docview/1652188677

https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy1.apus.edu/docview/2018926122/

http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=125105354&site=ehost-live&scope=site

http://ezproxy.apus.edu/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/1800147259/

http://ezproxy.apus.edu/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/1883488006/

http://ezproxy.apus.edu/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/2006749943/

http://ezproxy.apus.edu/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/2018924246/

Part 2 WHAT IS THE IMPACT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON U.S. COUNTERINTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS?

Research Proposal Part 1
Using the knowledge gained of research methods each student must write a ten-page; not counting the title page, abstract, and bibliography; Chapters 1 and 2 of a national security topic research proposal that the student has not previously submitted for credit.  Part 1 of the research proposal is designed for the student to focus on:
1.    Topic of interest,
WHAT IS THE IMPACT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON U.S. COUNTERINTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS?
2.    Narrowing the topic of interest to a clear and concise problem statement and research question,
3.    Discussing the significance of the proposed study and how it contributes to the existing body of National Security research, and
4.    Conduct a literature review of the topic that demonstrates a clear grasp of previous research findings related to the topic, problem statement and research question.
Shown below is a suggested outline:
Chapter 1 – Overview
Background and History of the Organization
Background of the Problem
Problem Statement
Research Question
Anticipated Problems
Significance of the Proposed Study
Chapter 2 – Review of the Literature
Literature Review
Summary and Conclusions of the Research
How the Proposed Research Would Tie-Into Existing Literature
All submissions, discussion boards and papers, must be formatted using the Chicago Manual of Style (CMOS).

Research proposal Part 2
The students final draft of a research proposal.  Building on instructor feedback to Research Proposal Part 1, students will update their previously submitted Chapter 1 and Chapter 2 and develop the beginning of Chapter 3 Methodology.  Shown below is a recommended outline for Chapter 3:
Chapter 3 Methodology
Overview
Definition and Operationalization of Variables
Hypothesis
What Data Will be Collected
  How the Data Will Be Collected
NSU IRB Considerations
        How Collected Data Will Be Analyzed
Proposal Feasibility
(Convincing the instructor that you have carefully thought through your proposal and could be completed.)
The minimum page requirement for the Research Proposal Part 2 is fifteen pages; not counting the title page, abstract, and bibliography. 
Students are remined the assignment is only a proposal and represents the first half of a research paper. Data collection regardless of form and data analysis are not allowed
All submissions, discussion boards and papers, must be formatted using the Chicago Manual of Style (CMOS).

WHAT IS THE IMPACT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON U.S. COUNTERINTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS?

Research Proposal Part 1
Using the knowledge gained of research methods each student must write a ten-page; not counting the title page, abstract, and bibliography; Chapters 1 and 2 of a national security topic research proposal that the student has not previously submitted for credit.  Part 1 of the research proposal is designed for the student to focus on:
1.    Topic of interest,
WHAT IS THE IMPACT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON U.S. COUNTERINTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS?
2.    Narrowing the topic of interest to a clear and concise problem statement and research question,
3.    Discussing the significance of the proposed study and how it contributes to the existing body of National Security research, and
4.    Conduct a literature review of the topic that demonstrates a clear grasp of previous research findings related to the topic, problem statement and research question.
Shown below is a suggested outline:
Chapter 1 – Overview
Background and History of the Organization
Background of the Problem
Problem Statement
Research Question
Anticipated Problems
Significance of the Proposed Study
Chapter 2 – Review of the Literature
Literature Review
Summary and Conclusions of the Research
How the Proposed Research Would Tie-Into Existing Literature
All submissions, discussion boards and papers, must be formatted using the Chicago Manual of Style (CMOS).

Research proposal Part 2
The students final draft of a research proposal.  Building on instructor feedback to Research Proposal Part 1, students will update their previously submitted Chapter 1 and Chapter 2 and develop the beginning of Chapter 3 Methodology.  Shown below is a recommended outline for Chapter 3:
Chapter 3 Methodology
Overview
Definition and Operationalization of Variables
Hypothesis
What Data Will be Collected
  How the Data Will Be Collected
NSU IRB Considerations
        How Collected Data Will Be Analyzed
Proposal Feasibility
(Convincing the instructor that you have carefully thought through your proposal and could be completed.)
The minimum page requirement for the Research Proposal Part 2 is fifteen pages; not counting the title page, abstract, and bibliography. 
Students are remined the assignment is only a proposal and represents the first half of a research paper. Data collection regardless of form and data analysis are not allowed
All submissions, discussion boards and papers, must be formatted using the Chicago Manual of Style (CMOS).

Ethics in Counterintelligence

After reviewing Lesson eight, and the required reading and video for the week, discuss a national security or military counterintelligence case or mission, law enforcement sting operation, or case of corporate espionage within the context of offensive and/or defensive principles.

Describe the setting of the mission, actors (agency and opponent), historical factors and considerations, phases of the operation, events and outcomes, countermeasures, ethics, and implications for the future of counterintelligence.

Make sure to include information from our required material for the week in your discussion. Cite your sources.

Vaults, Mirrors and Masks (Use Chap 12).

WHAT IS THE IMPACT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON U.S. COUNTERINTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS?

Topic was changed slightly.

Now the proposed problem statement and question is WHAT IS THE IMPACT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON U.S. COUNTERINTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS?

Be sure to label separately the problem statement and research question(s).

Discuss the importance of the topic for national security affairs management. In other words, why ask the question(s)?

This problem statement and question will start the process for a 15 page paper.

This has to be doctoral quality

Cultural Identity in Cinema

Compare two articles (from Hooks and During) to talk about how the films have the same theme of identity, which make the groups have similar traits hence leading to a sense belonging. Please also talk about the film Daughters of The Dust (1991) when develop the argument.
Please follow the poposal when writing paper.
The film is avaluable on YouTube but unfortunately it is not for free.

Literature Review in project management PMBok knowledge area

A literature review of 4 PMbok Knowledge Area in project time management, project stakeholder management, project communication management and project human resource management. The writer must follow the report outline structure provided. Sufficient references needed for the literature and Project Management Body of Knowledge must be included in the report. Average 550 words for each part, don’t too long or short

Covid-19

The United States has performed relatively poorly in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic. Which groups and/or institutions are responsible for this? Are institutions (e.g., federalism) or particular political actors (e.g., an administration or party) more to blame? Use at least 6 credible sources and use parenthetical citations, for example (Lee, 2018). Add a bibliography at the end.