support@swiftessaywriters.com
Our writing specialists have the knack to craft A-grade essays completely from scratch, regardless of the difficulty of your topic or your academic level.
Hi Writer, It’s me Kyle again with another Module Assignment.
Instructions Attached Via Screenshot. It says 750 words but I can only buy 550 right now – if you go over 550 words I will tip you accordingly and make sure you are compensated.
Here is the required resource that is linked in the instructions: http://aohs.ua.edu/cm/hy104/NewOrleans/index.html
Please let me know if there are any questions and thank you again!
January 29th, 2020 
Chicago / Turabian, Political Science 
Comments Off on Analysis and Summary of an Article Article Chosen: John C. Courtney, The Selection of National Party Leaders in Canada, Toronto, Macmillian, 1973
New Edition: (Mcgill-Queen’s University Press 1995)
Introduction :
Primary Idea of the text we are analysing
Angle of the analysis
Definition of certain concepts used throughout the paper
Display the structure of your paper
Summary of the text
At least one citation per paragraph
Analysis of the text
-Make a link to the present
-When was the text published, is the situation the same today? Is the text still relevant? are there other issues that should be adressed considering the today’s climate. Compare the events occuring in the text to another event occuring somewhere else in the world
Conclusion :
Re summarise the main idea of the text
sumarrise your analysis and critique
Closing statement
1200 1500 mots
Numbered pages
Chicago style
Bibliographie
What do the assigned readings and class lectures/discussions tell us about the role of class in 1860s Britain? Issues you may wish to consider include the rise of the detective service, the problem of poverty, working-class and middle-class family life, the problems of domestic service, and manners and morals.
January 29th, 2020 Chicago / Turabian, Other Comments Off on Canadian Medical Devices Conformity Assessment System The Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP) was developed in 2012 with the goal of creating a system where a single audit could be accepted across multiple jurisdictions. The program covers certification for ISO 13485 and also includes country-specific regulatory requirements, and provides many benefits to manufacturers including saving time and money. MDSAP is executed and utilized by a consortium of five regulatory bodies across five countries Australia (TGA), Brazil (ANVISA), Canada (Health Canada), U.S.A (FDA) and Japan (PMDA). If a manufacturer sells its device to all five participating countries, then the manufacturer must meet the QMS plus country-specific regulatory requirements of all five countries in order to be MDSAP certified.
Health Canada currently utilizes the CMDCAS (Canadian Medical Devices Conformity Assessment System) certificate per ISO 13485 as part of its medical device licensing process. MDSAP is not mandated by Australia, Japan, Brazil and the USA; however, as of January 1st 2019, Health Canada requires an MDSAP certificate from the manufacturer (or show proof that they are on track to be certified) to be able to market any medical devices in Canada and to maintain active device licenses.
Please review the following links and answer the questions below:
http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn/ucm372921.htm
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/InternationalPrograms/MDSAPPilot/default.htm
https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/InternationalPrograms/MDSAPPilot/ucm621589.htm
http://www.imdrf.org/documents/documents.asp
Discuss in your post all the following questions and include references.
1. Discuss and justify at least three pros and cons of the MDSAP program from the perspective of both the manufacturer and the involved regulatory bodies.
2. Do you think it is reasonable for Health Canada to mandate MDSAP requirement to market medical devices while it is not required in other markets – Justify why or why not.
3. What might be the potential consequences of the MDSAP mandate for both the Canadian healthcare industry and the Canadian citizens/healthcare consumers?
since you wrote for me before, you must be familiar with the content. These rponses are from others, just give them some comments with reference Chicago style.
For example, you can say: great post! I totally agree with your opinion and then add more detailed comment or additional description.
You do not need to cover every aspect from the readings but should focus on what most interests you and supports YOUR analysis of the material. It is often useful to ask yourself what these readings contribute to our understanding of work and labor in the U.S. and what problems remain. This should be your analysis (defined as your thoughts/opinions plus reasoning/evidence), not a summary.
January 27th, 2020 Chicago / Turabian, Law Comments Off on Science, society and Criminological Research Purpose: Identifying appropriate topics for research in criminology/criminal justice
In this assignment, you are to use the Internet to locate two (2) current news stories related to criminology or criminal justice. The first story should be about a topic that WOULD BE appropriate for criminological/criminal justice research. The second should be about a topic that WOULD NOT.
You will then write two summariesone for each article. Each summary should include:
– The title of the article.
– The source of the article.
– The publication date of the article.
– The articles URL.
– A brief summary of the article (i.e., using the old journalism approachdescribing the who, what, where, when, and why).
– A brief paragraph describing why the topic of the article is or is not an appropriate topic for research. There really are no right or wrong answers just make a rational and effective argument. Many of the concepts in Chapter 1 could be useful in your reasoning.
Written in size 12 Times New Roman font and double-spaced with one-inch margins
Cite the sources is by providing footnotes in the form of the Chicago Manual of Style
Please pick one of following.
1. Who were the Dews so-called apostles of disunion? Where did they come from and where did they go? More importantly, what was their mission? In other words, what gospel were these apostles sent to preach? Were they successful? What is the most important thing that can be learned from the words and actions of the apostles of disunion?
2. Dew says that the INS test for U.S. naturalization accepts two different answers to the question, the Civil War was fought over what important issue? What are the two possible answers? Why is it problematic that this question why did Americans fight their bloodiest war does not have a single answer, but instead two, seemingly mutual exclusive answers? What would the apostles of disunion answered to that question in 1860-61? After reading Dew, what is your answer to the question? Why?
3. Early in Apostles of Disunion, Dew makes reference to a number of current events that took place when he was finishing his book. What were the events? Why were these events so contentious? Can you see any parallels to events that have been going on recently in the country? What would Dew argue was at the heart of these fights? Do you agree with Dew or not? Why or why not?
TEXTBOOKS REQUIRED FOR THE PAPER
1. Livermore, David. Leading with Cultural Intelligence: The Real Secret to Success. 2nd ed. New York: AMACOM, 2015. ( READ CHAPTERS 1 – 4 )
2. Toomey, Stella T., and Leeva C. Chung. Understanding Intercultural Communication. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012. ( READ CHAPTER 1 – 3 )
RESEARCH PAPER: PART 1 INSTRUCTIONS
You will be required to write a 1,000-word evaluation of your personal cultural intelligence in current Turabian format.
You must support your assertions with a minimum of 1 textbook resource and 1 reference to your personal CQ Assessment report.
You will be required to identify strengths and areas where there is opportunity for growth while also proposing a plan for continuing to increase your CQ.
You will include an introduction of a minimum 250-words and an evaluation of a minimum of 750-words in addition to a title page, table of contents and bibliography citing both references. You will add to your bibliography with the completion of each part of the research paper.
NOTE: For the CQ Assessment paper Report, see it under the MY CQ REPORT, Open it and do the needful, and also for the strenghts and weeknesses also, you need to get it under my CQ Report also,
NOTE: PLEASE do not apply for this paper if you do not have access to the textbooks mentioned above in the reading textbooks please. Thanks.
Paper 1 requires you to review a judicial decision in an environmental law case (read the actual case decision written by the judge, not an article analysis or summary). If you are an environmental professional, you may want to write about a decision that is relevant to the work of your business or agency, or, you may choose a decision about an issue that interests you. The decision may be from either a state or federal Court (for example, the Colorado Supreme Court, U.S. District Court, the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, or the U.S. Supreme Court). You must include the full name and citation of the case in your references so that I can retrieve the full case opinion.
Write this paper as if you are an environmental professional in a company, government agency, or nonprofit group, and your supervisor has asked you to prepare a written synopsis of a case that affects your business, agency, or organization.
The written synopsis can be only four pages max (not including references page), must follow the Assignment Format in the Syllabus (for header, page numbers, etc.), and should include the following information:
A concise description of the issues presented in the case, including identification of the parties and a summary of the main arguments raised by the plaintiff and defendant.
A discussion of the analysis the court applied in reaching the decision: discuss the environmental laws they interpreted and the facts the court found significant.
Identify the major findings or decision(s) reached by the court (including any concurring or dissent opinions).
Finally, briefly describe the effect the decision may have upon the practicing environmental community (managers, scientists, advocates, citizens, etc.). This is why this case is relevant to your hypothetical audience receiving the memo: your employer. [This will not be in the case opinion, but your own personal analysis and writing].
The attached is a page of research tips that also includes a video link explaining how to search and find actual case opinions that is highly recommended to help you complete your paper: Case law research tips.pdf
